|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
2 Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: shenoy{at}stanford.edu.
Neural prosthetic interfaces use neural activity related to the planning and peri-movement epochs of arm-reaching to enable brain-directed control of external devices. Previous research has primarily centered on accurately decoding movement intention from either plan or peri-movement activity, but has assumed that temporal boundaries between these epochs are known to the decoding system. In this work, we develop a technique to automatically differentiate between baseline, plan, and peri-movement epochs of neural activity. Specifically, we use a generative model of neural activity to capture how neural activity varies between these three epochs. Our approach is based on a hidden Markov model (HMM), in which the latent variable (state) corresponds to the epoch of neural activity, coupled with a state-dependent Poisson firing model. Using an HMM and simultaneous 96-electrode recordings from the premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys, we demonstrate that the time of transition from baseline to plan epochs, a transition in neural activity which is not accompanied by any external behavior changes, can be detected using a threshold on the \emph{a posteriori} HMM state probabilities. Following detection of the plan epoch, we show that the intended target of a center-out movement can be detected about as accurately as a maximum likelihood estimator using a window of known plan activity. In addition, we demonstrate that our HMM can detect transitions in neural activity corresponding to targets not found in training data. Thus, the HMM technique for automatically detecting transitions between epochs of neural activity should enable prosthetic interfaces to operate autonomously.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. J. Hwang and R. A. Andersen Brain Control of Movement Execution Onset Using Local Field Potentials in Posterior Parietal Cortex J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14363 - 14370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, V. Gilja, S. I. Ryu, A. Afshar, M. Sahani, and K. V. Shenoy Factor-Analysis Methods for Higher-Performance Neural Prostheses J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1315 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Yu, J. P. Cunningham, G. Santhanam, S. I. Ryu, K. V. Shenoy, and M. Sahani Gaussian-Process Factor Analysis for Low-Dimensional Single-Trial Analysis of Neural Population Activity J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 614 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |