|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, UC Davis, Davis, California, United States
2 Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
3 CNS, New York University, New York, New York, United States
4 Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: annesmith{at}ucdavis.edu.
Accurate characterizations of behavior during learning experiments are essential for understanding the neural bases of learning. While learning experiments often give subjects multiple tasks to learn simultaneously, most analyze subject performance separately on each individual task. This analysis strategy ignores the true interleaved presentation order of the tasks and cannot distinguish learning behavior from response preferences that may represent a subject's biases or strategies. We present a Bayesian analysis of a state-space model for characterizing simultaneous learning of multiple tasks and for assessing behavioral biases in learning experiments with interleaved task presentations. Under the Bayesian analysis the posterior probability densities of the model parameters and the learning state are computed using Monte Carlo Markov Chain methods. Measures of learning, including the learning curve, the ideal observer curve and the learning trial translate directly from our previous likelihood-based state-space model analyses. We compare the Bayesian and current likelihood-based approaches in the analysis of a simulated conditioned T-maze task and of an actual object-place association task. Modeling the interleaved learning feature of the experiments along with the animal's response sequences allows us to disambiguate actual learning from response biases. The implementation of the Bayesian analysis using the WinBUGS software provides an efficient way to test different models without developing a new algorithm for each model. The new state-space model and the Bayesian estimation procedure suggest an improved, computationally-efficient approach for accurately characterizing learning in behavioral experiments.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Czanner, U. T. Eden, S. Wirth, M. Yanike, W. A. Suzuki, and E. N. Brown Analysis of Between-Trial and Within-Trial Neural Spiking Dynamics J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2672 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |