| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
2 Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gabbiani{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
The Lobula Giant Movement Detector (LGMD) in the locust visual system and its target neuron, the Descending Contralateral Movement Detector (DCMD), respond to approaching objects looming on a collision course with the animal. They thus provide a good model to study the cellular and network mechanisms underlying the sensitivity to this specific class of behaviourally relevant stimuli. We determined over an entire locust eye the density distribution of optical axes describing the spatial organization of local inputs to the visual system and compared it with the sensitivity distribution of the LGMD/DCMD to local motion stimuli. The density of optical axes peaks in the equatorial region of the frontal eye. Local motion sensitivity, however, peaks in the equatorial region of the caudolateral visual field and only correlates positively with the dorso-ventral density of optical axes. Upon local stimulation, both the velocity tuning and the response latency of the LGMD/DCMD depend on stimulus position within the visual field. Spatial and temporal integration experiments in which several local motion stimuli were activated either simultaneously or at fixed delays reveal that the LGMD processes local motion in a strongly sub-linear way. Thus, the neuron's integration properties seem to depend on several factors including its dendritic morphology, the local characteristics of afferent fiber inputs, and inhibition mediated by different pathways or by voltage-gated conductances. Our study shows that the selectivity of this looming sensitive neuron to approaching objects relies on more complex biophysical mechanisms than previously thought.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. P. Peron, H. G. Krapp, and F. Gabbiani Influence of Electrotonic Structure and Synaptic Mapping on the Receptive Field Properties of a Collision-Detecting Neuron J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 159 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Gabbiani and H. G. Krapp Spike-Frequency Adaptation and Intrinsic Properties of an Identified, Looming-Sensitive Neuron J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2951 - 2962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Santer, F. C. Rind, R. Stafford, and P. J. Simmons Role of an Identified Looming-Sensitive Neuron in Triggering a Flying Locust's Escape J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3391 - 3400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. B. Guest and J. R. Gray Responses of a Looming-Sensitive Neuron to Compound and Paired Object Approaches J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1428 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Neri Spatial Integration of Optic Flow Signals in Fly Motion-Sensitive Neurons J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1608 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Gabbiani, I. Cohen, and G. Laurent Time-Dependent Activation of Feed-Forward Inhibition in a Looming-Sensitive Neuron J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2150 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
