JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 22, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00977.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/4/1815    most recent
00977.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gamble, E. R
Right arrow Articles by DiCaprio, R. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gamble, E. R
Right arrow Articles by DiCaprio, R. A
Submitted on October 29, 2002
Accepted on December 10, 2002

Nonspiking and Spiking Proprioceptors in the Crab: White Noise Analysis of Spiking CB-Chordotonal Organ Afferents

Edward R Gamble1 and Ralph A DiCaprio1*

1 Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rdicaprio1{at}ohiou.edu.

The proprioceptors that signal the position and movement of the first two joints of crustacean legs provide an excellent system for comparison of spiking and nonspiking (graded) information transfer and processing in a simple motor system. The position, velocity, and acceleration of the first two joints of the crab leg are monitored by both nonspiking and spiking proprioceptors. The nonspiking thoracic-coxal muscle receptor organ (TCMRO) spans the TC joint, while the coxo-basal joint is monitored by the spiking CB chordotonal organ (CBCTO) and by nonspiking afferents arising from levator and depressor elastic strands. The response characteristics and nonlinear models of the input-output relationship for CB chordotonal afferents were determined using white noise analysis (Wiener kernel) methods. The first and second-order Wiener kernels for each of the four response classes of CB chordotonal afferents (position, position-velocity, velocity and acceleration) were calculated and the gain function for each receptor determined by taking the Fourier transform of the first-order kernel. In all cases, there was a good correspondence between the response of an afferent to deterministic stimulation (trapezoidal movement) and the best-fitting linear transfer function calculated from the first-order kernel. All afferents also had a nonlinear response component and second-order Wiener kernels were calculated for afferents of each response type. Models of afferent response based on the first and second-order kernels were able to predict the response of the afferents with an average accuracy of 86%.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. DiCaprio, C. P. Billimoria, and B. Ch. Ludwar
Information Rate and Spike-Timing Precision of Proprioceptive Afferents
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1706 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. P. Billimoria, R. A. DiCaprio, J. T. Birmingham, L. F. Abbott, and E. Marder
Neuromodulation of spike-timing precision in sensory neurons.
J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5910 - 5919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. DiCaprio
Information Transfer Rate of Nonspiking Afferent Neurons in the Crab
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 302 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. DiCaprio
Nonspiking and Spiking Proprioceptors in the Crab: Nonlinear Analysis of Nonspiking TCMRO Afferents
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1826 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.