JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol (April 7, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00991.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/1057    most recent
00991.2004v2
00991.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yakovenko, S.
Right arrow Articles by Prochazka, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yakovenko, S.
Right arrow Articles by Prochazka, A.
Submitted on September 21, 2004
Accepted on March 6, 2005

CONTROL OF LOCOMOTOR CYCLE DURATIONS

Sergiy Yakovenko, David McCrea, Katinka Stecina, and Arthur Prochazka*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arthur.prochazka{at}ualberta.ca.

In intact animals and humans, increases in locomotor speed are usually associated with decreases in step cycle duration. Most data indicate that the locomotor central pattern generator (CPG) shortens cycle duration mainly by shortening the durations of extensor rather than flexor phases of the step cycle. Here we report that in fictive locomotion elicited by electrical stimulation of the midbrain locomotor region (MLR) in the cat, spontaneous variations in cycle duration were due more to changes in flexor rather than extensor phase durations in 22 of 31 experiments. The locomotor CPG is therefore not inherently extensor- or flexor-biased. We coined the term "dominant" to designate the phase (flexion or extension) showing the larger variation. In a simple half-center oscillator model, experimental phase duration plots were fitted well by adjusting two parameters that corresponded to background drive ("bias") and sensitivity ("gain") of the oscillator's timing elements. By analogy we argue that variations in background drive to the neural timing elements of the CPG could produce larger variations in phase duration in the half-centre receiving the lower background drive, i.e. background drive may determine which half-centre is dominant. The fact that data from normal cats were also fitted well by the model indicates that sensory input and central drive combine to determine locomotor phase durations. We conclude that there is a considerable flexibility in the control of phase durations in MLR-induced fictive locomotion. We posit that this may be explained by changes in background excitation of neural timing elements in the locomotor CPG.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Barriere, J. Simmers, and D. Combes
Multiple Mechanisms for Integrating Proprioceptive Inputs That Converge on the Same Motor Pattern-Generating Network
J. Neurosci., August 27, 2008; 28(35): 8810 - 8820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. Prochazka and S. Yakovenko
Predictive and reactive tuning of the locomotor CPG
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
L. Juvin, J. Simmers, and D. Morin
Locomotor rhythmogenesis in the isolated rat spinal cord: a phase-coupled set of symmetrical flexion extension oscillators
J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 115 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. W. Jackson, F. A. Pino, E. D. Wiebe, and A. D. McClellan
Movements and Muscle Activity Initiated by Brain Locomotor Areas in Semi-Intact Preparations From Larval Lamprey
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3229 - 3241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Dominici, Y. P. Ivanenko, and F. Lacquaniti
Control of Foot Trajectory in Walking Toddlers: Adaptation to Load Changes
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2790 - 2801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. E. Musselman and J. F. Yang
Loading the Limb During Rhythmic Leg Movements Lengthens the Duration of Both Flexion and Extension in Human Infants
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1247 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
I. A. Rybak, N. A. Shevtsova, M. Lafreniere-Roula, and D. A. McCrea
Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from deletions during fictive locomotion
J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 617 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
I. A. Rybak, K. Stecina, N. A. Shevtsova, and D. A. McCrea
Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation
J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 641 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti
Spinal Cord Maps of Spatiotemporal Alpha-Motoneuron Activation in Humans Walking at Different Speeds
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 602 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Duysens, D. McCrea, and M. Lafreniere-Roula
How deletions in a model could help explain deletions in the laboratory
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 562 - 565.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
J. B. Nielsen, B. A. Conway, D. M. Halliday, M.-C. Perreault, and H. Hultborn
Organization of common synaptic drive to motoneurones during fictive locomotion in the spinal cat
J. Physiol., November 15, 2005; 569(1): 291 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.