JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 7, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00999.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1608    most recent
00999.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neri, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neri, P.
Submitted on September 22, 2005
Accepted on November 30, 2005

Spatial integration of optic flow signals in fly motion-sensitive neurons

Peter Neri1*

1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB23EJ, England

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pn{at}white.stanford.edu.

Neurons in the fly lobula plate integrate motion signals over large regions of visual space in a directionally selective manner. This study is concerned with the details of this integration process. We used a stimulus consisting of a 4 x 4 lattice of locally moving Gabor patches, in which each patch could take any direction independently. We also presented only one patch at a time, or two patches at a time. Across all possible directions of motion, the firing rate response r1+2 to two simultaneously presented patches was well described by r1+2(d1,d2)=G x [r1(d1)+r2(d2)]+S, where r1 and r2 are responses to individual patches moving in directions d1 and d2, and G~0.81, S~-23. However, this quasi-linear scaling expression failed to account for three main empirical observations: 1) the directional tuning curve for one patch is broader in the presence of another patch moving in the neuron's preferred direction (PD); 2) the vertical compression of this curve is greater when the second patch moves in the anti-preferred direction (AD) as opposed to PD; 3) the ability of the neuronal response to discriminate the direction of a patch is greater when the other patch is moving in the PD as opposed to AD, where this ability is assessed using both information theory and a standard discriminability index. In order to account for these departures from the simple scaling model, we used a normalization model very similar to one used for macaque area MT/V5. This model can qualitatively explain all three departures from the scaling equation described above, suggesting that a gain-control normalization network may be at work within the fly lobula plate.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Neri and D. Levi
Surround Motion Silences Signals From Same-Direction Motion
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2594 - 2602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Neri
Fast-scale adaptive changes of directional tuning in fly tangential cells are explained by a static nonlinearity
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3199 - 3208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.