JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 31, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01001.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/4/2612    most recent
01001.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakatsuka, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chino, Y. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakatsuka, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chino, Y. M
Submitted on September 21, 2006
Accepted on January 23, 2007

Effects of Perceptual Learning on Local Stereopsis and Neuronal Responses of V1 and V2 in Strabismic Monkeys

Chiaki Nakatsuka1, Bin Zhang1, Ichiro Watanabe1, Jianghe Zheng1, Hua Bi1, Liat Gantz1, Earl L Smith2, Ronald S Harwerth1, and Yuzo M Chino1*

1 College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
2 University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ychino{at}uh.edu.

Visual performance improves with practice (perceptual learning). In this study we sought to determine whether or not adult monkeys reared with early abnormal visual experience improve their stereo-acuity by extensive psychophysical training and testing, and if so, whether alterations of neuronal responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) and/or visual area 2 (V2) are involved in such improvement. Strabismus was optically simulated in 5 macaque monkeys using a prism-rearing procedure between 4 and 14 weeks of age. Around 2 years of age, three of the strabismic monkeys ("trained" monkeys) were tested for their spatial contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Two other strabismic monkeys received no training or testing ("untrained" monkeys). Microelectrode experiments were conducted around 4 years of age. All three trained monkeys showed substantial improvement in stereoacuity. However, final stereothresholds were still about 10-20 times worse than those in normal monkeys. In V1 disparity sensitivity was drastically reduced and behavioral training had no obvious effect in both the trained and untrained strabismic monkeys. In V2, disparity sensitivity was significantly better in the trained monkeys than in untrained monkeys. However, this difference in disparity sensitivity was not sufficient to account for the total magnitude of perceptual improvement. These data suggest that the observed improvement in stereoacuity of the trained strabismic monkeys may have resulted from better retention of disparity sensitivity in V2 and from "learning" by upstream neurons to more efficiently attend to residual local disparity information in V1 and/or V2.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.