JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 19, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01001.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/773    most recent
01001.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamane, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamane, S.
Submitted on September 8, 2007
Accepted on December 19, 2007

Effects of motor training on the recovery of manual dexterity after primary motor cortex lesion in macaque monkeys

Yumi Murata1, Noriyuki Higo1*, Takao Oishi2, Akiko Yamashita3, Keiji Matsuda1, Motoharu Hayashi2, and Shigeru Yamane4

1 Neuroscience Research Institute, AIST, Tsukuba, Japan
2 Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan
3 Division of Applied System Neuroscience, Advanced Medical Science Course, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
4 Maebashi Institute of Technology, Maebashi, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: n.higo{at}aist.go.jp.

To investigate the effects of post-lesion training on motor recovery, we compared the motor recovery of macaque monkeys that had received intensive motor training with those that received no training after a lesion of the primary motor cortex (M1). An ibotenic acid lesion in the M1 digit area resulted in impairment of hand function, with complete loss of digit movement. In the monkeys that had undergone intensive daily training (1 h per day, 5 days per week) after the lesion, behavioral indexes used to evaluate manual dexterity recovered to the same level as in the pre-lesion period after 1 or 2 months of post-lesion training period. Relatively independent digit movements, including precision grip (prehension of a small object with finger-to-thumb opposition), were restored in the trained monkeys. While the behavioral indexes of manual dexterity recovered to some extent in the monkeys without the post-lesion training, they remained lower than those in the pre-lesion period until several months after M1 lesion. The untrained monkeys frequently used alternate grip strategies to grasp a small object with the affected hand, holding food pellets between the tip of the index finger and the dorsum of the thumb. These results suggest that the recovery after M1 lesion includes both use-dependent and use-independent processes, and that the recovery of precision grip can be promoted by intensive use of the affected hand in post-lesion training.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.