JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 20, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01004.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/2158    most recent
01004.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buia, C. I
Right arrow Articles by Tiesinga, P. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buia, C. I
Right arrow Articles by Tiesinga, P. H
Submitted on September 9, 2007
Accepted on February 14, 2008

The role of interneuron diversity in the cortical microcircuit for attention

Calin I Buia1 and Paul H Tiesinga1*

1 Physics & Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tiesinga{at}physics.unc.edu.

Receptive fields of neurons in cortical area V4 are large enough to fit multiple stimuli, making V4 the ideal place to study the effects of selective attention at the single neuron level. Experiments have revealed evidence for stimulus competition and have characterized the effect thereon of spatial and feature-based attention. We developed a biophysical model with spiking neurons and conductance-based synapses. In order to account for the comprehensive set of experimental results, it was necessary to include in the model, in addition to regular spiking excitatory (E) cells, two types of interneurons: feedforward interneurons (FFI) and top-down interneurons (TDI). Feature-based attention was mediated by a projection of the TDI to the FFI, stimulus competition was mediated by a cross-columnar excitatory connection to the FFI, whereas spatial attention was mediated by an increase in activity of the feedforward inputs from cortical area V2. The model predicts that spatial attention increases the FFI firing rate, whereas feature-based attention decreases the FFI firing rate and increases the TDI firing rate. During strong stimulus competition, the E cells were synchronous in the beta frequency range (15-35 Hz), but with feature-based attention they became synchronous in the gamma frequency range (35-50 Hz). We propose that the FFI correspond to fast-spiking, parvalbumin-positive basket cells and that the TDI correspond to cells with a double-bouquet morphology which are immunoreactive to calbindin or calretinin. Taken together, the model results provide an experimentally testable hypothesis for the behavior of two interneuron types under attentional modulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Womelsdorf, K. Anton-Erxleben, and S. Treue
Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation
J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8934 - 8944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.