JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 29, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01005.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1642    most recent
01005.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Hurk, P.
Right arrow Articles by Toni, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Hurk, P.
Right arrow Articles by Toni, I.
Submitted on September 22, 2006
Accepted on November 24, 2006

On-line maintenance of sensory and motor representations: Effects on cortico-spinal excitability

Paul van den Hurk1, Rogier B. Mars2, Gijs van Elswijk1, Judith Hegeman3, Jaco W. Pasman4, Bastiaan R. Bloem5, and Ivan Toni6*

1 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
2 F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; University College London, London, United Kingdom
3 Radboud University Nijmegen Medial Centre, Nijmegen, United States
4 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Netherlands
5 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
6 F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ivan.toni{at}fcdonders.kun.nl.

Flexible behavior requires the ability to delay a response until it is appropriate. This can be achieved by holding either a sensory or a motor representation on-line. Here we assess whether maintenance of sensory or motor material drives the motor system to different functional states, as indexed by alterations of corticospinal excitability. We used single-pulse TMS to measure cortico-spinal excitability evoked during the delay period of a novel paradigm in which task contingencies, rather than explicit verbal instructions, induced participants to use either sensory or motor codes to solve a delay-non-match-to-sample (DNMS) task (Toni et al. 2002b). This approach allowed us to probe the state of the motor system while the participants were retaining either sensory or motor codes to cross the delay period, rather than the control of short-term storage driven by verbal instructions. When participants could prepare the movement in advance (PREPARATION trials), the excitability of the motor cortex contralateral to the moving hand increased, while the excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex decreased. The increase in excitability was confined to the prime mover, whereas the decrease in excitability extended to cortical territories controlling muscles unrelated to the response. Crucially, these changes in excitability were evoked only during PREPARATION trials, but not during trials in which subjects needed to maintain sensory items on-line (MEMORY trials). We infer that short-term storage of sensory information and preparation of motor responses have differential and specific access to the output stage of the motor system.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.