JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 7, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01014.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/2222    most recent
01014.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palla, A.
Right arrow Articles by Straumann, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palla, A.
Right arrow Articles by Straumann, D.
Submitted on September 27, 2005
Accepted on December 4, 2005

Dissociated hysteresis of static ocular counterroll in humans

Antonella Palla1*, Christopher J. Bockisch2, Oliver Bergamin3, and Dominik Straumann1

1 Neurology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Neurology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: antpalla{at}access.unizh.ch.

In stationary head roll positions the eyes are cyclodivergent. We asked whether this phenomenon can be explained by a static hysteresis that differs between the eyes contra- (CE) and ipsilateral (IE) to head roll. Using a motorized turntable, healthy human subjects (N = 8) were continuously rotated about the earth-horizontal naso-occipital axis. Starting from the upright position, a total of three full rotations at a constant velocity (2 °/s) were completed (acceleration = 0.05 °/s2, velocity plateau reached after 40 s). Subjects directed their gaze upon a flashing laser dot straight ahead (switched on 20 ms every 2 s). Binocular three-dimensional eye movements were recorded with dual search coils that were modified (wires exiting inferiorly) to minimize torsional artifacts by the eyelids. A sinusoidal function with a first and second harmonic was fitted to torsional eye position as a function of torsional whole-body position at constant turntable velocity. The amplitude and phase of the first harmonic differed significantly between the two eyes (paired t-tests: p < 0.05): on average, counterroll amplitude of IE was larger (CE: 6.6° ± 1.6 SD; IE: 8.1° ± 1.7 SD), while CE showed more position lag relative to the turntable (CE: 12.5° ± 10.7 SD; IE: 5.1° ± 8.7 SD). We conclude that cyclodivergence observed during static ocular counterroll is mainly a result of hysteresis that depends on whether eyes are contra- or ipsilateral to head roll. Static hysteresis also explains the phenomenon of residual torsion, i.e. an incomplete torsional return of the eyes when the first 360° whole-body rotation was completed and subjects were back in upright position (extorsion of CE: 2.0° ± 0.10 SD; intorsion of IE: 1.4° ± 0.10 SD). A computer model that includes asymmetric backlash for each eye can explain dissociated torsional hysteresis during quasi-static binocular counterroll. We hypothesize that ocular torsional hysteresis is introduced at the level of the otolith pathways because the direction-dependent torsional position lag of the eyes is related to the head roll position, not the eye position.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. N. Lorincz and B. J. M. Hess
Dynamic Effects on the Subjective Visual Vertical After Roll Rotation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 657 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.