JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 9, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01015.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/1/268    most recent
01015.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foffani, G.
Right arrow Articles by Moxon, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foffani, G.
Right arrow Articles by Moxon, K. A.
Submitted on September 12, 2007
Accepted on April 1, 2008

Computational Role of Large Receptive Fields in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex

Guglielmo Foffani1, John K Chapin2, and Karen A. Moxon3*

1 Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2 SUNY Health Science Ctr, United States; SUNY Health Science Ctr
3 Drexel University, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: karen.moxon{at}drexel.edu.

Computational studies are challenging the intuitive view that neurons with broad tuning curves are necessarily less discriminative than neurons with sharp tuning curves. In the context of somatosensory processing, broad tuning curves are equivalent to large receptive fields. To clarify the computational role of large receptive fields for cortical processing of somatosensory information, we recorded ensembles of single-neurons from the infragranular forelimb/forepaw region of the rat primary somatosensory cortex while tactile stimuli were separately delivered to different locations on the forelimbs/forepaws under light anesthesia. Using single-trial analyses of many, single-neuron responses, we obtained two main results.(1)The responses of even small populations of neurons recorded from within the same estimated column/segregate can be used to discriminate between stimuli delivered to different surround locations in the excitatory receptive fields.(2)The temporal precision of surround responses is sufficiently high for spike-timing to add information over spike-count in the discrimination between surround locations. This surround spike-timing code (i) is particularly informative when spike-count is ambiguous, e.g. in the discrimination between close locations or when receptive fields are large, (ii) becomes progressively more informative as the number of neurons increases, (iii) is a first-spike code and (iv) is not limited by the assumption that the time of stimulus onset is known. These results suggest that even though large receptive fields result in a loss of spatial selectivity of single-neurons, they can provide as a counterpart a sophisticated temporal code based on latency differences in large populations of neurons, without necessarily sacrificing basic information about stimulus location.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Foffani, M. L. Morales-Botello, and J. Aguilar
Spike Timing, Spike Count, and Temporal Information for the Discrimination of Tactile Stimuli in the Rat Ventrobasal Complex
J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5964 - 5973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Middleton, A. Longtin, J. Benda, and L. Maler
Postsynaptic Receptive Field Size and Spike Threshold Determine Encoding of High-Frequency Information Via Sensitivity to Synchronous Presynaptic Activity
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1160 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.