JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01019.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1167    most recent
01019.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nolt, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, L. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nolt, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, L. A
Submitted on September 25, 2006
Accepted on June 24, 2007

Suppression at High Spatial Frequencies in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Cat

Mark J Nolt1*, Romesh Devjibhai Kumbhani1, and Larry A Palmer1

1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nolt{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.

The spatial weighting functions of both retinal and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) X-cell receptive fields have been viewed as the difference of two Gaussians (DOG). We focus on a particular shortcoming of the DOG model, namely suppression of responses of LGN cells at spatial frequencies above those to which the classical receptive field surround is responsive. By simultaneously recording one of the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) inputs (S-potentials) to an LGN cell, we find that half of this suppression at high spatial frequencies arises from the retinal input, and that suppression in LGN cells is greater than that in RGCs, regardless of spatial frequency. We also inactivated the ipsilateral visual cortex and show that one quarter of the suppression at high spatial frequencies arises from corticothalamic feedback. We show that this suppression at high spatial frequencies is co-localized with the classical surround, is not dependent on the relative orientation of the center and surround stimuli, and that the cortical component of this suppression is divisive. We propose that the role of this suppression at high spatial frequencies is to restrict the response to large stimuli composed of high spatial frequencies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.