|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
2 Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
3 Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
4 Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pgribble{at}spindle.ssc.uwo.ca.
Cocontraction (the simultaneous activation of antagonist muscles around a joint) provides the nervous system with a way to adapt the mechanical properties of the limb to changing task requirements - both in statics and during movement. However relatively little is known about the conditions under which the motor system modulates limb impedance through cocontraction. The goal of this study was to test for a possible relationship between cocontraction and movement accuracy in multi-joint limb movements. The electromyographic activity of 7 single- and double-joint shoulder and elbow muscles was recorded using surface electrodes while subjects performed a pointing task in a horizontal plane to targets that varied randomly in size. Movement speed was controlled by providing subjects with feedback on a trial-to-trial basis. Measures of cocontraction were estimated both during movement, and during a 200 ms window immediately following movement end. We observed an inverse relationship between target size and cocontraction: as target size was reduced, cocontraction activity increased. In addition, trajectory variability decreased and endpoint accuracy improved. This suggests that although energetically expensive, cocontraction may be a strategy used by the motor system to facilitate multi-joint arm movement accuracy. We also observed a general trend for cocontraction levels to decrease over time, supporting the idea that cocontraction and associated limb stiffness are reduced over the course of practice.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. W. Tobalske and A. A. Biewener Contractile properties of the pigeon supracoracoideus during different modes of flight J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 170 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Scheidt and C. Ghez Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3600 - 3613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Hudson, L. T. Maloney, and M. S. Landy Movement Planning With Probabilistic Target Information J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 3034 - 3046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Liu and E. Todorov Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9354 - 9368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget Computational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 331 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. P. J. Selen, J. H. van Dieen, and P. J. Beek Impedance Modulation and Feedback Corrections in Tracking Targets of Variable Size and Frequency J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2750 - 2759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zakotnik, T. Matheson, and V. Durr Co-contraction and passive forces facilitate load compensation of aimed limb movements. J. Neurosci., May 10, 2006; 26(19): 4995 - 5007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Fuglevand, A. P. Dutoit, R. K. Johns, and D. A. Keen Evaluation of plateau-potential-mediated 'warm up' in human motor units J. Physiol., March 15, 2006; 571(3): 683 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. ARIMOTO, M. SEKIMOTO, and R. OZAWA A Challenge to Bernstein's Degrees-of-Freedom Problem in Both Cases of Human and Robotic Multi-Joint Movements IEICE Trans A: Fundamentals, October 1, 2005; E88-A(10): 2484 - 2495. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Shiller, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry Voluntary Control of Human Jaw Stiffness J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2207 - 2217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Leonardo and M. S. Fee Ensemble Coding of Vocal Control in Birdsong J. Neurosci., January 19, 2005; 25(3): 652 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Franklin, U. So, M. Kawato, and T. E. Milner Impedance Control Balances Stability With Metabolically Costly Muscle Activation J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 3097 - 3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Osu, N. Kamimura, H. Iwasaki, E. Nakano, C. M. Harris, Y. Wada, and M. Kawato Optimal Impedance Control for Task Achievement in the Presence of Signal-Dependent Noise J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 1199 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. van Beers, P. Haggard, and D. M. Wolpert The Role of Execution Noise in Movement Variability J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 1050 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maschke, C. M. Gomez, T. J. Ebner, and J. Konczak Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxia Progressively Impairs Force Adaptation During Goal-Directed Arm Movements J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 230 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |