JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 8, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01031.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1656    most recent
01031.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, S.
Submitted on September 26, 2006
Accepted on November 3, 2006

Neurophysiology of prehension: II. Response diversity in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortex

Esther P. Gardner1*, Jin Y. Ro1, K. Srinivasa Babu1, and Soumya Ghosh1

1 Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gardne01{at}endeavor.med.nyu.edu.

Prehension responses of 76 neurons in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortex were analyzed in three macaques during performance of a grasp and lift task. Digital video recordings of hand kinematics synchronized to neuronal spike trains were compared to responses in posterior parietal areas 5 and AIP/7b (PPC) of the same monkeys during seven task stages: 1) approach, 2) contact, 3) grasp, 4) lift, 5) hold, 6) lower, and 7) relax. S-I and M-I firing patterns signaled particular hand actions, rather than overall task goals. S-I responses were more diverse than those in PPC, occurred later in time, and focused primarily on grasping. 63% of S-I neurons fired at peak rates during contact and/or grasping. Lift, hold, and lowering excited fewer S-I cells. Only 8% of S-I cells fired at peak rates prior to contact, compared to 27% in PPC. M-I responses were also diverse, forming functional groups for hand preshaping, object acquisition, and grip force application. M-I activity began up to 500 ms before contact, coinciding with the earliest activity in PPC. Activation of specific muscle groups in the hand was paralleled by matching patterns of somatosensory feedback from S-I needed for efficient performance. These findings support hypotheses that predictive and planning components of prehension are represented in PPC and premotor cortex, while performance and feedback circuits dominate activity in M-I and S-I. Somatosensory feedback from the hand to S-I enables real-time adjustments of grasping via connections to M-I, and updates future prehension plans through projections to PPC.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Murata, N. Higo, T. Oishi, A. Yamashita, K. Matsuda, M. Hayashi, and S. Yamane
Effects of Motor Training on the Recovery of Manual Dexterity After Primary Motor Cortex Lesion in Macaque Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 773 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. P. Gardner, K. S. Babu, S. Ghosh, A. Sherwood, and J. Chen
Neurophysiology of Prehension. III. Representation of Object Features in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3708 - 3730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.