JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 5, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01033.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/831    most recent
01033.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, C. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, C. J. S.
Submitted on September 18, 2007
Accepted on November 29, 2007

The influence of briefly presented randomised target motion on the extra-retinal component of ocular pursuit

Graham Robert Barnes1* and C. J. Sue Collins2

1 Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
2 Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; , United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.r.barnes{at}manchester.ac.uk.

We assessed the ability to extract velocity information from brief exposure of a moving target and sought evidence that this information could be used to modulate the extra-retinal component of ocular pursuit. A step-ramp target motion was initially visible for a brief randomised period of 50, 100, 150 or 200ms, but then extinguished for a randomised period of 400 or 600ms before reappearing and continuing along its trajectory. Target speed (5-20deg/s), direction (left/right) and inter-trial interval (2.7-3.7s) were also randomised. Smooth eye movements were initiated after ~130ms and comprised an initial visually-dependent component, which reached a peak velocity that increased with target velocity and initial exposure duration, followed by a sustained secondary component that actually increased throughout extinction for 50 and 100ms initial exposures. End-extinction eye velocity, reflecting extra-retinal drive, increased with initial exposure from 50-100ms but remained similar for longer exposures; it was significantly scaled to target velocity for 150 and 200ms exposures. The results suggest that extra-retinal drive is based on a sample of target velocity, mostly acquired during the first 150ms, that is stored and forms a goal for generating appropriately scaled eye movements during absence of visual input. End-extinction eye velocity was significantly higher when target reappearance was expected than when it was not, confirming the importance of expectation in generating sustained smooth movement. However, end-extinction eye displacement remained similar irrespective of expectation, suggesting that the ability to use sampled velocity information to predict future target displacement operates independently of the control of smooth eye movement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. R. Barnes and C.J.S. Collins
Evidence for a Link Between the Extra-Retinal Component of Random-Onset Pursuit and the Anticipatory Pursuit of Predictable Object Motion
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1135 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.