JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 30, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01037.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1428    most recent
01037.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guest, B. B
Right arrow Articles by Gray, J. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guest, B. B
Right arrow Articles by Gray, J. R
Submitted on October 3, 2005
Accepted on November 25, 2005

Responses of a looming sensitive neuron to compound and paired object approaches

Bruce B Guest1 and John R Gray1*

1 Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jack.gray{at}usask.ca.

The lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) and its target neuron, the descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD), constitute a motion-sensitive pathway in the locust visual system that responds preferentially to objects approaching on a collision course. LGMD receptive field properties, anisotropic distribution of local retinotopic inputs across the visual field and localized habituation to repeated stimuli suggest that this pathway should be sensitive to approaches of individual objects within a complex visual scene. We presented locusts with compound looming objects while recording from the DCMD to test the effects of non-uniform edge expansion on looming responses. We also presented paired objects approaching from different regions of the visual field at non-overlapping, closely-timed and simultaneous approach intervals to study DCMD responses to multiple looming stimuli. We found that looming compound objects evoked characteristic responses in the DCMD and that the time of peak firing was consistent with predicted values based on a weighted ratio of the half size of each distinct object edge and the absolute approach velocity. We also found that the azimuthal position and interval of paired approaches affected DCMD firing properties and that DCMDs responded to individual objects approaching within 106 ms of each other. Moreover, comparisons between individual and paired approaches revealed that overlapping approaches are processed in a strongly sublinear manner. These findings are consistent with biophysical mechanisms that produce nonlinear integration of excitatory and feed-forward inhibitory inputs onto the LGMD which have been shown to underlie responses to looming stimuli.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Fotowat and F. Gabbiani
Relationship between the Phases of Sensory and Motor Activity during a Looming-Evoked Multistage Escape Behavior
J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 10047 - 10059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. P. Peron, H. G. Krapp, and F. Gabbiani
Influence of Electrotonic Structure and Synaptic Mapping on the Receptive Field Properties of a Collision-Detecting Neuron
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 159 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.