JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 25, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01038.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1809    most recent
01038.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balter, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balter, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, E. P.
Submitted on September 28, 2006
Accepted on October 23, 2006

Neural coupling between the arms and legs during rhythmic locomotor-like cycling movement

Jaclyn E. Balter1 and E. Paul Zehr1*

1 Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pzehr{at}uvic.ca.

Neuronal coupling between the arms and legs allowing coordinated rhythmic movement during locomotion is poorly understood. We used the modulation of cutaneous reflexes to probe this neuronal coupling between the arms and legs using a cycling paradigm. Participants performed rhythmic cycling with arms, legs, or arms and legs together (ARM&LEG). We hypothesized that any contributions from the arms would be functionally linked to locomotion and would thus be phase-dependent. Reflexes were evoked by electrical stimulation of the superficial peroneal nerve at the ankle and EMG was recorded from muscles in the arms and legs. The main finding was that the relative contribution from the arms and legs was linked to the functional state of the legs. For example, in TA the largest contribution from arm movement (57% variance accounted for (VAF), p< .05) was during the leg power phase while the largest from leg movement (71% VAF, p< .05) was during leg cycling recovery. Thus, the contribution from the arms was functionally gated throughout the locomotor cycle in a manner that appears to support the action of the legs. Additionally, the effect of arm cycling on reflexes in leg muscles when the legs were not moving was relatively minor; full expression of the effect of rhythmic arm movement was only observed when both the arms and legs were moving. Our findings provide experimental support for the interaction of rhythmic arm and leg movement during human locomotion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Kawashima, D. Nozaki, M. O. Abe, and K. Nakazawa
Shaping Appropriate Locomotive Motor Output Through Interlimb Neural Pathway Within Spinal Cord in Humans
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2946 - 2955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. P. Zehr, M. Klimstra, K. Dragert, Y. Barzi, M. G. Bowden, B. Javan, and C. Phadke
Enhancement of Arm and Leg Locomotor Coupling With Augmented Cutaneous Feedback From the Hand
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1810 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. P. Zehr, J. E. Balter, D. P. Ferris, S. R. Hundza, P. M. Loadman, and R. H. Stoloff
Neural regulation of rhythmic arm and leg movement is conserved across human locomotor tasks
J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 209 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.