|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pn232{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk.
Stereoscopic vision relies mainly on relative depth differences between objects, rather than on their absolute distance in depth from where the eyes fixate. However, relative disparities are computed from absolute disparities, and it is not known where these two stages are represented in the human brain. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we assessed absolute and relative disparity selectivity with stereoscopic stimuli consisting of pairs of transparent planes in depth in which the absolute and relative disparity signals could be independently manipulated (at a local spatial scale). In experiment 1, relative disparity was kept constant, while absolute disparity was varied in half the blocks of trials ('mixed' blocks) and kept constant in the remaining half ('same' blocks), alternating between blocks. Because neuronal responses undergo adaptation and reduce their firing rate following repeated presentation of an effective stimulus, the fMRI signal reflecting activity of units selective for absolute disparity is expected to be smaller during 'same' blocks as compared to 'mixed' ones. Experiment 2 similarly manipulated relative disparity rather than absolute disparity. The results from both experiments were consistent with adaptation with differential effects across visual areas such that 1) dorsal areas (V3A, MT+/V5, V7) showed more adaptation to absolute than to relative disparity; 2) ventral areas (hV4, V8/V4
) showed an equal adaptation to both; 3) early visual areas (V1, V2, V3) showed a small effect in both experiments. These results indicate that processing in dorsal areas may rely mostly on information about absolute disparities, while ventral areas split neural resources between the two types of stereoscopic information so as to maintain an important representation of relative disparity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Preston, Z. Kourtzi, and A. E. Welchman Adaptive Estimation of Three-Dimensional Structure in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., February 11, 2009; 29(6): 1688 - 1698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Georgieva, R. Peeters, H. Kolster, J. T. Todd, and G. A. Orban The Processing of Three-Dimensional Shape from Disparity in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., January 21, 2009; 29(3): 727 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Preston, S. Li, Z. Kourtzi, and A. E. Welchman Multivoxel Pattern Selectivity for Perceptually Relevant Binocular Disparities in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11315 - 11327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Roe, A. J. Parker, R. T. Born, and G. C. DeAngelis Disparity Channels in Early Vision J. Neurosci., October 31, 2007; 27(44): 11820 - 11831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dinstein, U. Hasson, N. Rubin, and D. J. Heeger Brain Areas Selective for Both Observed and Executed Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1415 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Umeda, S. Tanabe, and I. Fujita Representation of Stereoscopic Depth Based on Relative Disparity in Macaque Area V4 J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 241 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nakatsuka, B. Zhang, I. Watanabe, J. Zheng, H. Bi, L. Ganz, E. L. Smith, R. S. Harwerth, and Y. M. Chino Effects of Perceptual Learning on Local Stereopsis and Neuronal Responses of V1 and V2 in Prism-Reared Monkeys J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2612 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chandrasekaran, V. Canon, J. C. Dahmen, Z. Kourtzi, and A. E. Welchman Neural Correlates of Disparity-Defined Shape Discrimination in the Human Brain J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1553 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uka and G. C. DeAngelis Linking neural representation to function in stereoscopic depth perception: roles of the middle temporal area in coarse versus fine disparity discrimination. J. Neurosci., June 21, 2006; 26(25): 6791 - 6802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O. Murray, C. A. Olman, and D. Kersten Spatially Specific fMRI Repetition Effects in Human Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2439 - 2445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Larsson, M. S. Landy, and D. J. Heeger Orientation-Selective Adaptation to First- and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 862 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uka, S. Tanabe, M. Watanabe, and I. Fujita Neural Correlates of Fine Depth Discrimination in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10796 - 10802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Neri A Stereoscopic Look at Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1823 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |