JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 7, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01042.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3532    most recent
01042.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. B.T.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. B.T.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R
Submitted on September 29, 2006
Accepted on February 21, 2007

Repetition Suppression in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex: Relation to Behavioral Priming

David B.T. McMahon1* and Carl R Olson2

1 Department of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3890, United States; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dbtm{at}mit.edu.

In tasks requiring judgments about visual stimuli, humans exhibit repetition priming, responding with increased speed when a stimulus is repeated. Repetition priming might depend on repetition suppression, a phenomenon, first observed in monkey inferotemporal cortex (IT), whereby, when a stimulus is repeated, the strength of the neuronal visual response is reduced. If the reduction resulted in sharpening of the cortical representation of the stimulus, and did not just scale it down, then speeded processing might result. To explore the relation between repetition priming and repetition suppression, we monitored neuronal activity in IT while monkeys performed a symmetry decision task. We found (1) that monkeys exhibit repetition priming, (2) that IT neurons simultaneously exhibit repetition suppression, (3) that repetition priming and repetition suppression do not vary in a significantly correlated fashion across trials and (4) that repetition suppression scales down the representation of the stimulus without sharpening it. We conclude that repetition suppression accompanies repetition priming but is unlikely to be its cause.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. P. Sripati and C. R. Olson
Representing the Forest before the Trees: A Global Advantage Effect in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7788 - 7796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Woloszyn and D. L. Sheinberg
Neural Dynamics in Inferior Temporal Cortex during a Visual Working Memory Task
J. Neurosci., April 29, 2009; 29(17): 5494 - 5507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. T. McMahon and C. R. Olson
Linearly Additive Shape and Color Signals in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1867 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Liu, S. O. Murray, and B. Jagadeesh
Time Course and Stimulus Dependence of Repetition-Induced Response Suppression in Inferotemporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 418 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Liu and B. Jagadeesh
Neural Selectivity in Anterior Inferotemporal Cortex for Morphed Photographic Images During Behavioral Classification or Fixation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 966 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Epstein, W. E. Parker, and A. M. Feiler
Two Kinds of fMRI Repetition Suppression? Evidence for Dissociable Neural Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2877 - 2886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Z. Lin
fMRI Adaptation: Stimulus Specific or Processing Load Specific?
J. Neurosci., October 24, 2007; 27(43): 11453 - 11454.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.