JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 18, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.01056.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/4/2205    most recent
01056.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churchland, M. M
Right arrow Articles by Lisberger, S. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churchland, M. M
Right arrow Articles by Lisberger, S. G
Submitted on November 21, 2002
Accepted on June 12, 2003

Evidence for object permanence in the smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys

Mark M Churchland1*, I-han Chou2, and Stephen G Lisberger3

1 Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: church{at}stanford.edu.

We recorded the smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys in response to targets that were extinguished (blinked) for 200 ms in mid-trajectory. Eye velocity declined considerably during the target blinks, even when the blinks were completely predictable in time and space. Eye velocity declined whether blinks were presented during maintained, steady-state pursuit of target motion at a constant velocity, during initiation of pursuit before target velocity was reached, or during eye accelerations induced by a change in target velocity. When a physical occluder covered the trajectory of the target during blinks, creating the impression that the target moved behind it, the decline in eye velocity was reduced or abolished. If the target was occluded once the eye had reached target velocity, pursuit was only slightly poorer than normal, uninterrupted pursuit. In contrast, if the target was occluded during the initiation of pursuit, while the eye was accelerating towards target velocity, pursuit during occlusion was very different from normal, uninterrupted pursuit. Eye velocity remained relatively stable during target occlusion, showing much less acceleration than normal, uninterrupted pursuit, and much less of a decline than was produced by a target blink. Anticipatory or predictive eye acceleration was typically observed just prior to the reappearance of the target. Computer simulations show that these results are best understood by assuming that a mechanism of eye-velocity memory remains engaged during target occlusion, but is disengaged subsequent to target blinks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. F. Soechting and M. Flanders
Extrapolation of Visual Motion for Manual Interception
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2956 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. R. Barnes and C. J. S. Collins
The Influence of Briefly Presented Randomized Target Motion on the Extraretinal Component of Ocular Pursuit
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 831 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J.-J. Orban de Xivry and P. Lefevre
Saccades and pursuit: two outcomes of a single sensorimotor process
J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 11 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
O. J. Hulme and S Zeki
The Sightless View: Neural Correlates of Occluded Objects
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1197 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
Q. Xiao, A. Barborica, and V. P. Ferrera
Modulation of Visual Responses in Macaque Frontal Eye Field during Covert Tracking of Invisible Targets
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 918 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-J. Orban de Xivry, S. J. Bennett, P. Lefevre, and G. R. Barnes
Evidence for Synergy Between Saccades and Smooth Pursuit During Transient Target Disappearance
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 418 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Tanaka
Involvement of the Central Thalamus in the Control of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., June 22, 2005; 25(25): 5866 - 5876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Ono, V. E. Das, J. R. Economides, and M. J. Mustari
Modeling of Smooth Pursuit-Related Neuronal Responses in the DLPN and NRTP of the Rhesus Macaque
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 108 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Bennett and G. R. Barnes
Predictive Smooth Ocular Pursuit During the Transient Disappearance of a Visual Target
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 578 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.