| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA
2 Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmalpeli{at}uiuc.edu.
The parabigeminal nucleus (PBN) is a small satellite of the superior colliculus, located on the edge of the midbrain. To identify activity related to visuomotor behavior, we recorded from PBN cells in cats trained to fixate moving and stationary targets. Cats tracked moving targets primarily with small catch-up saccades, and for target speeds of 2-6 deg/s, they did so with sufficient accuracy to keep targets within 2.5 deg of the visual axis most of the time. During intersaccade intervals of such close-order tracking, PBN cells fired at rates related to retinal position error (RPE), the distance between the center of the retina and the saccade target. Each cell was characterized by a best direction of RPE. Most commonly, activity rose rapidly with increasing RPE, peaked at a small RPE within the area centralis, and dropped off gradually with increasing target distance. For some cells, the range over which activity was monotonically related to RPE was considerably larger, but since the PBN was not systematically sampled, the maximum range of RPE encoded is presently unknown. During saccades, activity began to change at about peak saccade velocity, and then rapidly reached a level appropriate to the RPE achieved at saccade end. Most response fields were large, and stationary saccade targets presented anywhere within them evoked brisk responses that terminated abruptly upon saccade offset. Spontaneous saccades in the dark had little effect on PBN activity. These data suggest that the PBN is an integral part of a midbrain circuit generating target location information.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. A. Goddard, E. I. Knudsen, and J. R. Huguenard Intrinsic Excitability of Cholinergic Neurons in the Rat Parabigeminal Nucleus J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3486 - 3493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Marin, C. Salas, E. Sentis, X. Rojas, J. C. Letelier, and J. Mpodozis A Cholinergic Gating Mechanism Controlled by Competitive Interactions in the Optic Tectum of the Pigeon J. Neurosci., July 25, 2007; 27(30): 8112 - 8121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Maczko, P. F. Knudsen, and E. I. Knudsen Auditory and Visual Space Maps in the Cholinergic Nucleus Isthmi Pars Parvocellularis of the Barn Owl J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12799 - 12806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Gruberg, E. Dudkin, Y. Wang, G. Marin, C. Salas, E. Sentis, J. Letelier, J. Mpodozis, J. Malpeli, H. Cui, et al. Influencing and Interpreting Visual Input: The Role of a Visual Feedback System J. Neurosci., October 11, 2006; 26(41): 10368 - 10371. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Marin, J. Mpdozis, E. Sentis, T. Ossandon, and J. C. Letelier Oscillatory Bursts in the Optic Tectum of Birds Represent Re-Entrant Signals from the Nucleus Isthmi Pars Parvocellularis J. Neurosci., July 27, 2005; 25(30): 7081 - 7089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Smythies How the brain decides what we see J R Soc Med, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 18 - 20. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
