JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 12, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.01075.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/12    most recent
01075.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeets, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hooge, I. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smeets, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hooge, I. T.
Submitted on December 3, 2002
Accepted on February 5, 2003

The nature of variability in saccades

Jeroen B. Smeets1* and Ignace T. Hooge2

1 Neurowetenschappen, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Psychonomie, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.smeets{at}erasmusmc.nl.

We studied the variability in saccades by comparing the peak velocities of saccades with the same target amplitude made with different actual amplitudes. We tested three hypotheses namely: 1) the pulse height noise hypothesis (peak velocity and amplitude vary proportionally), 2) the localization noise hypothesis (variability in amplitude and peak velocity lie along the main sequence), and 3) the independent noise hypothesis (variability in amplitude and peak velocity are independent). We measured eye orientation in two experiments by a scleral coil and a video system. Surprisingly, the main source of variability of saccades depended on the measurement system used. A combination of localization noise and independent noise best describes the data obtained by the video system. The independent noise (e.g. measurement inaccuracy) was the main source of variability. For the scleral coils, the variability was considerably larger than for the less accurate video system. The pulse-height noise hypothesis best describes this additional variability. Therefore, we conclude that pulse-height noise is the main source of variability in saccades measured with scleral coils. We discuss the influence of scleral coils on saccade generation, and suggest that a change in motor strategy due to the discomfort of wearing the coils might be the cause of the increased variability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. van Beers
The Sources of Variability in Saccadic Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8757 - 8770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.