JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 7, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01106.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/14    most recent
01106.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by McPeek, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by McPeek, R. M
Submitted on October 4, 2007
Accepted on November 1, 2007

Target selection for visually-guided reaching in macaque

Joo-Hyun Song1*, Naomi Takahashi1, and Robert M McPeek1

1 The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jhsong{at}fas.harvard.edu.

We examined target selection for visually-guided reaching in monkeys using a visual search task in which an odd-colored target was presented with distractors. The colors of the target and distractors were randomly switched in each trial between red and green, and the number of distractors was varied. Previous studies of saccades and attention have shown that target selection in this task is easier when a greater number of homogenous distractors is present. We found that monkeys made fewer reaches to distractors and that reaches to the target were completed more quickly when a greater number of homogenous distractors was present. When the target was presented in a sparse array of distractors, reaches had longer movement durations and greater trajectory curvature. Reaching errors were directed more often to a distractor adjacent to the target, suggesting a spatially coarse-to-fine progression during target selection. Reaches were also influenced by the properties of trials in the recent past. When the colors of the target and distractors remained the same from trial to trial rather than switching, reaches were completed more quickly and accurately, indicating that color priming across trials facilitates target selection. Moreover, when difficult search trials were randomly intermixed with easier trials without distractors, reach latencies were influenced by the difficulty of previous trials, indicating that motor initiation strategies are gradually adjusted based on accumulated experience. Overall, these results are consistent with reaching results in humans, indicating that the monkey provides a sound model for understanding the neural underpinnings of reach target selection.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. McPeek
Reversal of a Distractor Effect on Saccade Target Selection After Superior Colliculus Inactivation
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2694 - 2702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.