JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 16, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.01110.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/2795    most recent
01110.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Read, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Read, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, B. G.
Submitted on December 11, 2002
Accepted on July 10, 2003

Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex

Jenny C. Read1* and Bruce G. Cumming1

1 National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jcr{at}lsr.nei.nih.gov.

Disparity-selective neurons in striate cortex (V1) probably implement the initial processing which supports binocular vision. Recently, much progress has been made in understanding the computations which these neurons perform on retinal inputs. The binocular energy model has been highly successful in providing a simple theory of these computations. A key feature of the energy model is that it is linear until after inputs from the two eyes are combined. Recently, however, a modified version of the energy model, incorporating threshold nonlinearities prior to binocular combination, has been proposed in order to account for the weaker disparity tuning observed with anticorrelated stimuli (Cumming and Parker 1997; Read et al. 2002). In this paper, we present new data needed for a critical assessment of these two models. We compare two key predictions of the models with responses of disparity-selective neurons recorded from V1 of awake fixating monkeys. We find that the original energy model, and a family of generalizations retaining linear binocular combination, are quantitatively inconsistent with the response of V1 neurons. In contrast, the modified version incorporating threshold nonlinearities can explain both sets of observations. We conclude that the energy model can be reconciled with experimental observations by adding a threshold prior to binocular combination. This gives us the clearest picture yet of the computation being carried out by disparity-selective V1 neurons.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Kumano, S. Tanabe, and I. Fujita
Spatial Frequency Integration for Binocular Correspondence in Macaque Area V4
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 402 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. M. Sanada and I. Ohzawa
Encoding of Three-Dimensional Surface Slant in Cat Visual Areas 17 and 18
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2768 - 2786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
M. M. Michel and R. A. Jacobs
The costs of ignoring high-order correlations in populations of model neurons.
Neural Comput., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 660 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming
Effect of Interocular Delay on Disparity-Selective V1 Neurons: Relationship to Stereoacuity and the Pulfrich Effect
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1541 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Neri
A Stereoscopic Look at Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1823 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. C.A. Read and B. G. Cumming
Understanding the Cortical Specialization for Horizontal Disparity
Neural Comput., October 1, 2004; 16(10): 1983 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming
Ocular Dominance Predicts Neither Strength Nor Class of Disparity Selectivity With Random-Dot Stimuli in Primate V1
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1271 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.