JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 27, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01112.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/1180    most recent
01112.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Delgutte, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lane, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Delgutte, B.
Submitted on October 26, 2004
Accepted on April 24, 2005

NEURAL CORRELATES AND MECHANISMS OF SPATIAL RELEASE FROM MASKING: SINGLE-UNIT AND POPULATION RESPONSES IN THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS

Courtney C. Lane1* and Bertrand Delgutte2

1 Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
2 Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: court{at}rice.edu.

Spatial release from masking (SRM), a factor in listening in noisy environments, is the improvement in auditory signal detection obtained when a signal is separated in space from a masker. To study the neural mechanisms of SRM, we recorded from single units in the inferior colliculus (IC) of barbiturate-anesthetized cats, focusing on low-frequency neurons sensitive to interaural time differences. The stimulus was a broadband chirp train with a 40-Hz repetition rate in continuous broadband noise, and the unit responses were measured for several signal and masker (virtual) locations. Masked thresholds (the lowest signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, for which the signal could be detected for 75% of the stimulus presentations) changed systematically with signal and masker location. Single-unit thresholds did not necessarily improve with signal and masker separation; instead, they tended to reflect the units' azimuth preference. Both how the signal was detected (through a rate increase or decrease) and how the noise masked the signal response (suppressive or excitatory masking) changed with signal and masker azimuth, consistent with a cross-correlator model of binaural processing. However, additional processing, perhaps related to the signal's amplitude modulation rate, appeared to influence the units' responses. The population masked thresholds (the most sensitive unit's threshold at each signal and masker location) did improve with signal and masker separation due to the variety of azimuth preferences in our unit sample. The population thresholds were similar to human behavioral thresholds in both SNR value and shape, indicating that these units may provide a neural substrate for low-frequency SRM.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Siveke, C. Leibold, and B. Grothe
Spectral Composition of Concurrent Noise Affects Neuronal Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences of Tones in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2705 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. V. Seshagiri and B. Delgutte
Response Properties of Neighboring Neurons in the Auditory Midbrain for Pure-Tone Stimulation: A Tetrode Study
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2058 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.