Submitted on October 9, 2007
Accepted on January 14, 2008
Differential modulation of spinal and corticospinal excitability during drop jumps
Wolfgang Taube1*, Christian Leukel1, Martin Schubert2, Markus Gruber3, Timo Rantalainen4, and Albert Gollhofer5
1 Sports Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
2 Swiss Paraplegic Centre, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Institute of Sport Science, University Freiburg, Schwarzwaldstr. 175, Freiburg i. Br., 79117, Germany; Dept. of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyvaskyla, Neuromuscular Research Centre, Finland
4 Neuromuscular Research Centre, Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
5 Dep of Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wolfgang.taube{at}sport.uni-freiburg.de.
Previously it was shown that spinal excitability during hopping and drop jumping is high in the initial phase of ground contact when the muscle is stretched, but decreases towards take off. To further understand motor control of stretch-shortening cycle this study aimed to compare modulation of spinal and corticospinal excitability at distinct phases following ground contact in drop jump. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and H-reflexes were elicited at the time of the short (SLR), medium (MLR) and long (LLR, LLR2) latency responses of the soleus muscle (SOL) after jumps from 31 cm height. MEPs and H-reflexes were expressed relative to the background EMG activity.
H-reflexes were highly facilitated at SLR (172%) and then progressively decreased (MLR=133%, LLR=123%, LLR2=110%). TMS showed no effect at SLR, MLR and LLR whereas MEPs were significantly facilitated at the LLR2 (122%; p=0.003). Background EMG was highest at LLR and lowest at LLR2.
Strong H-reflex facilitation at the beginning of the stance phase indicated significant contribution of Ia-afferent input to the 
-motoneurons during this phase which then progressively declined towards take off. Conversely, corticospinal excitability was exclusively increased at the phase of push off (LLR2, ~120 ms). It is argued that corticomotoneurons increased their excitability at LLR2. At LLR (~90 ms), Ia-afferent transmission as well as corticospinal excitability was low whereas background EMG was high. Therefore it is speculated that other sources, presumably subcortical in origin, contributed to the EMG activity at LLR in drop jumps.
