JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 15, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.01130.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/6/3168    most recent
01130.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gamlin, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gamlin, P. D.
Submitted on December 16, 2002
Accepted on January 7, 2003

THE PRIMATE PUPILLARY LIGHT REFLEX: RECEPTIVE FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF PRETECTAL LUMINANCE NEURONS

Robert J. Clarke1, Hongyu Zhang1, and Paul D. Gamlin1*

1 Vision Science Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pgamlin{at}uab.edu.

This study examined the response properties of luminance neurons found within the pretectal olivary nucleus (PON), which is the pretectal nucleus that mediates the primate pupillary light reflex. We recorded the activity of 121 single-units in alert, behaving rhesus monkeys trained to fixate a back-projected laser spot while a luminance stimulus was presented. The change in the firing rate of luminance neurons was measured as a function of changes in the size, retinal illuminance and position of the stimulus. We found that these neurons possessed large receptive fields, which were sufficiently distinct that they could be placed into three classes. Approximately 40% of the PON luminance neurons responded well to stimuli, whether they were presented in either the contralateral or ipsilateral hemifield. These neurons were classified as 'bilateral' neurons. In the primate, retinal projections to the pretectum and other retinorecipient nuclei are organized such that direct retinal input can only account for the contralateral hemifield responses of these neurons. Thus, the representation of the ipsilateral hemifield in 'bilateral' PON cells must result from input from a non-retinal source. Approximately 30% of PON neurons responded only to stimuli presented in the contralateral hemifield. These neurons were classified as 'contralateral' neurons. Finally, approximately 30% of PON neurons responded primarily to stimuli presented at or near the animal's fixation point. These neurons were classified as 'macular' neurons. The mean firing rates of all classes of neurons increased with increases in stimulus size and luminance within their receptive fields. The thresholds and magnitude of these responses closely matched those that would be appropriate for mediating the pupillary light reflex. In summary, these results suggest that all three classes of PON neurons contribute to the behaviorally observed pupillomotor field characteristics in which stimuli at the macular produce substantially larger pupillary responses than more peripheral stimuli. The contributions of 'bilateral' and 'contralateral' cells account for pupillary responses evoked by peripheral changes in luminance, while the contributions of all three cell classes account for the larger pupillary responses evoked by stimuli in the central visual field.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.