JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 17, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01152.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/1124    most recent
01152.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ustinova, K. I
Right arrow Articles by Levin, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ustinova, K. I
Right arrow Articles by Levin, M. F.
Submitted on October 31, 2005
Accepted on May 8, 2006

Central resetting of neuromuscular steady states may underlie rhythmical arm movements

Ksenia I Ustinova1, Anatol G. Feldman2, and Mindy F. Levin3*

1 School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Institute of Neurology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
2 Department of Physiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; CRIR Research Center, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, Canada
3 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; CRIR Research Center, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mindy.levin{at}mcgill.ca.

Changing the steady state configuration of the body may be an important function of central pattern generators for locomotion and other rhythmical movements. Thereby, muscle activation, forces, and movement may emerge following a natural tendency of the neuromuscular system to achieve the current steady state configuration. To verify that transitions between different steady states occur during rhythmical movements, we asked standing subjects to swing one or both arms synchronously or reciprocally at ~ 0.8 Hz from the shoulder joints. In randomly selected cycles, one arm was transiently arrested by an electromagnetic device. Swinging resumed after some delay and phase resetting. During bilateral swinging, the non-perturbed arm often stopped before resuming swinging at a position that was close to either the extreme forward or the extreme backward arm position observed before the perturbation. Oscillations usually resumed when both arms arrived at similar extreme positions when a synchronous bilateral pattern was initially produced or at the opposite positions if the initial pattern was reciprocal. Results suggest that a central generator controls both arms as a coherent unit by producing transitions between its steady state (equilibrium) positions. By controlling these positions, the system may define the spatial boundaries of movement. At these positions, the system may halt the oscillations, resume them at a new phase, or initiate a new motor action. Our findings are relevant to locomotion and suggest that walking may also be generated by transitions between several equilibrium configurations of the body, possibly accomplished by modulation and gating of proprioceptive reflexes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.