JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 14, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01157.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1556    most recent
01157.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boothe, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boothe, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, T. W.
Submitted on November 2, 2005
Accepted on December 8, 2005

Temporal Correlations in Stochastic Models of Double Bursting During Simulated Locomotion

David L. Boothe1*, Avis H. Cohen2, and Todd W. Troyer3

1 Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
2 Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA; Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA; Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
3 Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: boothe{at}umd.edu.

The output of the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion falls into two broad categories; alternation between antagonistic muscles, and double bursting within muscles acting on multiple joints. We first model an alternating half-center, and then present two different models of double bursting. The first double bursting model consists of a central clock with an explicit one-to-one mapping between interneuron activity and model output. The second double bursting model consists of a half-center with an added feedback neuron. Models are built using rate-coded leaky integrator neurons with slow self-inhibition. Structure-function relationships are explored by the addition of noise. The interaction of noise with the dynamics of each network creates a unique pattern of correlation between phases of the simulated cycle. The effects of noise can be explained by perturbation of deterministic versions of the networks. Three basic results were obtained: 1) slow self-inhibitory currents lead to correlations between parts of the step cycle that are separated in time and network relative; 2) model outputs are most sensitive to perturbations presented just before competitive switches in network activity, and; 3) clock-like models possess substantial symmetries within the correlation structure of burst durations, whereas the correlation structure of feedback models are asymmetric. Our models suggest that variability in burst length durations can be analyzed to make inferences about the structure of the spinal networks for locomotion. In particular, correlation patterns within double bursting outputs may yield important clues regarding the interaction between more central, clock-like networks and feedback from more peripheral interneurons.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.