|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, Universityof Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
2 Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wguido{at}lsuhsc.edu.
It has been proposed that the thalamus is composed of at least two types of nuclei. First order relay nuclei transmit signals from the periphery to the cortex while higher order nuclei may route information from one cortical area to another. Although much is known about the functional properties of relay neurons in first order nuclei, little is known about relay neurons belonging to higher order nuclei. We investigated the electrophysiological properties of relay cells in a higher order thalamic nucleus, using in vitro intracellular recordings from thalamic slices of the rat's lateral posterior nucleus (LPN). We found neurons of the LPN possess many of the same membrane properties as first order relay neurons. These included low-threshold calcium spikes (IT) and burst firing, a mixed cation conductance (IH) that prevented membrane hyperpolarization, and a transient K+ conductance that delayed spike firing (IA). The repetitive firing characteristics of LPN neurons were more distinct. One group of cells, located in the more caudal regions of the LPN responded to depolarizing current pulses with a train of action potentials or in a regular spiking (RS) mode. This form of firing showed a steep but highly linear increase in firing frequency with increasing levels of membrane depolarization. Another group of cells, located in the more rostral regions of the LPN, responded to depolarizing current pulses with clusters of high frequency bursts, or in a clustered spiking (CS) mode. The overall firing frequency rose nonlinearly with membrane depolarization, but the frequency of a given burst remained relatively constant. The caudal LPN receives input from the superior colliculus, while the rostral LPN receives input from layers V and VI of the visual cortex. Thus, the RS and CS cells may be driven by subcortical and cortical inputs respectively, and the distinct temporal properties of their response modes may be a necessary component of the LPN circuitry.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. R. Llinas and M. Steriade Bursting of Thalamic Neurons and States of Vigilance J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3297 - 3308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Golomb, E. Ahissar, and D. Kleinfeld Coding of Stimulus Frequency by Latency in Thalamic Networks Through the Interplay of GABAB-Mediated Feedback and Stimulus Shape J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1735 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, W. Guido, and M. E. Bickford Two Distinct Types of Corticothalamic EPSPs and Their Contribution to Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3429 - 3440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |