JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 28, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.01163.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/6/2696    most recent
01163.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niven, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by French, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niven, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by French, A. S.
Submitted on December 4, 2003
Accepted on January 21, 2004

Interactions between Light Induced Currents, Voltage-gated Currents and Input Signal Properties in Drosophila Photoreceptors

Jeremy E. Niven, Mikko Vahasoyrinki, Mikko Juusola, and Andrew S. French*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andrew.french{at}dal.ca.

Voltage-gated K+ channels are important in neuronal signaling, but little is known of their interactions with receptor currents or their behavior during natural stimulation. We used nonparametric and parametric nonlinear modeling of experimental responses, combined with Hodgkin-Huxley style simulation, to examine the roles of K+ channels in forming the responses of wild type (WT) and Shaker mutant (Sh14) Drosophila photoreceptors to naturalistic stimulus sequences. Naturalistic stimuli gave different results than similar experiments with white noise stimuli. Sh14 responses were larger and faster than WT. Simulation indicated that, in addition to eliminating the Shaker current, the mutation changed the current flowing through light dependent channels (Light Induced Current, or LIC) and increased the delayed rectifier current. Part of the change in LIC could be attributed to direct feedback from the voltage-sensitive ion channels to the light-sensitive channels via the membrane potential. However, we argue that other changes occur in the light detecting machinery of Sh14 mutants, possibly during photoreceptor development.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. E. Niven and S. B. Laughlin
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1792 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Vahasoyrinki, J. E. Niven, R. C. Hardie, M. Weckstrom, and M. Juusola
Robustness of neural coding in Drosophila photoreceptors in the absence of slow delayed rectifier K+ channels.
J. Neurosci., March 8, 2006; 26(10): 2652 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.