JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 21, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01171.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/629    most recent
01171.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.
Submitted on October 22, 2007
Accepted on November 15, 2007

Different Roles for AMPA and NMDA Receptors in Transmission at the Immature Retinogeniculate Synapse

Xiaojin Liu1 and Chinfei Chen1*

1 Neurobiology Program, Division in Neuroscience, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chinfei.chen{at}childrens.harvard.edu.

The relay of information at the retinogeniculate synapse, the connection between retina and visual thalamus, begins days before eye opening, and is thought to play an important role in the maturation of neural circuits in the thalamus and visual cortex. Remarkably, during this period of development, the retinogeniculate synapse is immature, with single retinal ganglion cell inputs evoking an average peak excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) of only ~40 pA when compared to 800 pA in mature synapses. Yet, at the mature synapse, EPSCs greater than 400 pA are needed to drive relay neuron firing. This raises the question of how small amplitude EPSCs can drive transmission at the immature retinogeniculate synapse. Here we find that several features of the immature synapse, when compared to the mature synapse, contribute to synaptic transmission. First, although the peak amplitude of EPSC is small, the decay time course of both AMPA and NMDA receptor (NMDAR) currents is significantly slower. The prolonged time course of NMDAR currents is a result of the presence of NR2B as well as NR2C/D subunits. In addition, extended presence of neurotransmitter released prolongs the synaptic current time course. Second, reduced sensitivity to magnesium block results in significantly greater synaptic charge transfer through NMDAR. Third, AMPAR currents contribute to the spike latency, but not to temporal precision at the immature synapse. Furthermore, intrinsic excitability is greater. These properties enable immature synapses with predominantly NMDAR and little or no AMPAR to contribute to the relay of information from retina to visual cortex.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
W. Guido
Refinement of the retinogeniculate pathway
J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4357 - 4362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.