JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 23, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01172.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/4/1616    most recent
01172.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scholl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scholl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, M.
Submitted on October 22, 2007
Accepted on January 23, 2008

Level dependence of contextual modulation in auditory cortex

Ben Scholl1, Xiang Gao1, and Michael Wehr1*

1 Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wehr{at}uoregon.edu.

Responses of cortical neurons to sensory stimuli within their receptive fields can be profoundly altered by the stimulus context. In visual and somatosensory cortex, contextual interactions have been shown to change sign from facilitation to suppression depending on stimulus strength. Contextual modulation of high contrast stimuli tends to be suppressive, but for low contrast stimuli tends to be facilitative. This trade-off may optimize contextual integration by cortical cells, and has been suggested to be a general feature of cortical processing, but it remains unknown whether a similar phenomenon occurs in auditory cortex. Here we used whole cell and single unit recordings to investigate how contextual interactions in auditory cortical neurons depend on the relative intensity of masker and probe stimuli in a two-tone stimulus paradigm. We tested the hypothesis that relatively low level probes should show facilitation, whereas relatively high level probes should show suppression. We found that contextual interactions were primarily suppressive across all probe levels, and that relatively low level probes were subject to stronger suppression than high level probes. These results were virtually identical for spiking and subthreshold responses. This suggests that, unlike visual cortical neurons, auditory cortical neurons show maximal suppression rather than facilitation for relatively weak stimuli.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.