JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 10, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.01173.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/1/444    most recent
01173.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.
Submitted on December 8, 2003
Accepted on March 8, 2004

Modular Functional Organization of Cat Anterior Auditory Field

Kazuo Imaizumi1*, Nicholas J. Priebe2, Poppy A. Crum1, Purvis H. Bedenbaugh3, Steven W. Cheung1, and Christoph E. Schreiner1

1 Keck Center, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
2 Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL, USA
3 Neuroscience and Otolaryngology, Univ of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kazuo{at}phy.ucsf.edu.

Two tonotopic areas, the primary auditory cortex (AI) and the anterior auditory field (AAF), are the primary cortical fields in the cat auditory system. They receive largely independent, concurrent thalamocortical projections from the different thalamic divisions despite their hierarchical equivalency. The parallel streams of thalamic inputs to AAF and AI suggest that AAF neurons may differ from AI neurons in physiological properties. While a modular functional organization in cat AI has been well documented, little is known about the internal organization of AAF beyond tonotopy. We studied how basic receptive field parameters (RFPs) are spatially organized in AAF with single- and multi-unit recording techniques. A distorted tonotopicity with an under-representation in mid-frequencies (1 and 5 kHz) and an over-representation in the high frequency range was found. Spectral bandwidth (Q-values) and response threshold were significantly correlated with characteristic frequency (CF). To understand whether AAF has a modular organization of RFPs, CF dependencies were eliminated by a non-parametric, local regression model, and the residuals (difference between the model and observed values) were evaluated. In a given iso-frequency domain, clusters of low or high residual RFP values were interleaved for threshold, spectral bandwidth, and latency, suggesting a modular organization. However, RFP modules in AAF were not expressed as robustly as in AI. A comparison of RFPs between AAF and AI shows that AAF neurons were more broadly tuned and had shorter latencies than AI neurons. These physiological field differences are consistent with anatomical evidence of largely independent, concurrent thalamocortical projections in AI and AAF, which strongly suggest field-specific processing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Carrasco and S. G. Lomber
Evidence for Hierarchical Processing in Cat Auditory Cortex: Nonreciprocal Influence of Primary Auditory Cortex on the Posterior Auditory Field
J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14323 - 14333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Carrasco and S. G. Lomber
Differential Modulatory Influences between Primary Auditory Cortex and the Anterior Auditory Field
J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8350 - 8362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. K. Bizley, K. M. M. Walker, B. W. Silverman, A. J. King, and J. W. H. Schnupp
Interdependent Encoding of Pitch, Timbre, and Spatial Location in Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 18, 2009; 29(7): 2064 - 2075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Bendor and X. Wang
Neural Response Properties of Primary, Rostral, and Rostrotemporal Core Fields in the Auditory Cortex of Marmoset Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 888 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. K. Pandya, D. L. Rathbun, R. Moucha, N. D. Engineer, and M. P. Kilgard
Spectral and Temporal Processing in Rat Posterior Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 301 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Imaizumi and C. E. Schreiner
Spatial Interaction Between Spectral Integration and Frequency Gradient in Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2933 - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. Polley, H. L. Read, D. A. Storace, and M. M. Merzenich
Multiparametric Auditory Receptive Field Organization Across Five Cortical Fields in the Albino Rat
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3621 - 3638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. C. Lee and J. A. Winer
Principles Governing Auditory Cortex Connections
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1804 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. K. Bizley, F. R. Nodal, I. Nelken, and A. J. King
Functional Organization of Ferret Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1637 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. W. Cheung, S. S. Nagarajan, C. E. Schreiner, P. H. Bedenbaugh, and A. Wong
Plasticity in Primary Auditory Cortex of Monkeys with Altered Vocal Production
J. Neurosci., March 9, 2005; 25(10): 2490 - 2503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.