JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 9, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01176.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/5/3016    most recent
01176.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isoda, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isoda, M.
Submitted on November 15, 2004
Accepted on February 8, 2005

Context-dependent stimulation effects on saccade initiation in the presupplementary motor area of the monkey

Masaki Isoda1*

1 Department of Physiology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Program, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: isodam{at}nei.nih.gov.

Although evidence suggests that the contribution of the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) to voluntary motor control is effector-nonselective, the question of how electrical stimulation of the pre-SMA affects eye movements remains unanswered. To address this issue, stimulus effects of the pre-SMA of monkeys on saccade initiation were investigated during performance of a visually guided saccade task with an instructed delay period. This report describes two major findings. First, when stimuli with currents of 80 µA or less were applied before the presentation of a GO signal, the reaction time (RT) of an upcoming saccade shortened, with comparable effects on ipsiversive and contraversive saccades. Second, stimuli that were delivered after the GO signal lengthened the RT, which resulted in greater effects on ipsiversive saccades. In addition, the stimulation yielded a mild impairment of saccade accuracy, particularly when the stimulation was delivered following the GO signal. By themselves, however, these stimuli did not directly elicit eye movements. Therefore, the stimulus effects appeared only in the context of the behavioral task and were dependent on the phase of the task. These findings provide additional support for the hypothesis that the involvement of the pre-SMA in motor control can be linked to either eye or arm motor system, dependent on behavioral context.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.