JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 23, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01177.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/1541    most recent
01177.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Read, J. C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Read, J. C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, B. G.
Submitted on November 15, 2004
Accepted on March 15, 2005

The effect of interocular delay on disparity-selective V1 neurons: relationship to stereoacuity and the Pulfrich effect

Jenny C. A. Read* and Bruce G. Cumming

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jcr{at}lsr.nei.nih.gov.

The temporal properties of disparity-sensitive neurons place important temporal constraints on stereo matching. We examined these constraints by measuring the responses of disparity-selective neurons in striate cortex of awake behaving monkeys to random dot stereograms that contained interocular delays. Disparity selectivity was gradually abolished by increasing interocular delay (when the delay exceeds the integration time, the inputs from the two eyes become uncorrelated). The amplitude of the disparity-selective response was a Gaussian function of interocular delay, with a standard deviation of 16ms (±5ms, SD). Psychophysical measures of stereoacuity, in both monkey and human observers, showed a closely similar dependence on time, suggesting that temporal integration in V1 neurons is what determines psychophysical matching constraints over time. There was a slight but consistent asymmetry in the neuronal responses, as if the optimum stimulus is one in which the right stimulus leads by ~4ms. Since all recordings were made in the left hemisphere, this probably reflects naso-temporal differences in conduction times; psychophysical data are compatible with this interpretation. In only a few neurons (5/72), interocular delay caused a change in the preferred disparity. Such tilted disparity/delay profiles have been invoked previously to explain depth perception in the stroboscopic version of the Pulfrich effect (and other variants). However, the great majority of the neurons did not show tilted disparity/delay profiles. This suggests that either the activity of these neurons is ignored when viewing Pulfrich stimuli, or that current theories relating neuronal properties to perception in the Pulfrich effect need to be reevaluated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Nienborg and B. G. Cumming
Macaque v2 neurons, but not v1 neurons, show choice-related activity.
J. Neurosci., September 13, 2006; 26(37): 9567 - 9578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.