JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 14, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.01178.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/6/2515    most recent
01178.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keen, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fuglevand, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keen, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fuglevand, A. J.
Submitted on December 8, 2003
Accepted on January 9, 2004

Distribution Of Motor Unit Force In Human Extensor Digitorum Assessed By Spike-Triggered Averaging And Intraneural Microstimulation

Douglas A. Keen and Andrew J. Fuglevand*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fuglevan{at}u.arizona.edu.

A peculiar aspect of the muscular organization of the human hand is that the main flexors and extensors of the fingers are muscles that each give rise to four parallel tendons that insert upon all the fingers. It has been hypothesized that these multi-tendoned muscles are comprised of functional compartments with each finger controlled by a discrete population of motor units. The purpose of this study was to determine the force distribution across the four fingers for motor units in human extensor digitorum (ED), a multi-tendoned muscle that extends the fingers. The force distribution was assessed by spike-triggered averaging and intraneural microstimulation for 233, and 18 ED units, respectively. A selectivity index from 0 (force equally distributed across the fingers) to 1.0 (force concentrated on a single finger) was used to quantify the distribution of motor-unit force across the four digits. The mean selectivity index was high for ED motor units assessed with intraneural microstimulation (0.90 ± 0.28) and was significantly greater than that obtained with spike-triggered averaging (0.38 ± 0.14). Therefore, it is likely that each finger is acted upon by ED through a discrete population of motor units and that weak synchrony between motor units in different compartments of ED may have contributed to the appearance of spike-triggered average force on multiple fingers. Moreover, the high selectivity of motor units for individual fingers may provide the mechanical substrate needed for highly fractionated movements of the human hand.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H. van Duinen, W. S. Yu, and S. C. Gandevia
Limited ability to extend the digits of the human hand independently with extensor digitorum
J. Physiol., October 15, 2009; 587(20): 4799 - 4810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.N.A.L. Leijnse, N. H. Campbell-Kyureghyan, D. Spektor, and P. M. Quesada
Assessment of Individual Finger Muscle Activity in the Extensor Digitorum Communis by Surface EMG
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3225 - 3235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.N.A.L. Leijnse, S. Carter, A. Gupta, and S. McCabe
Anatomic Basis for Individuated Surface EMG and Homogeneous Electrostimulation With Neuroprostheses of the Extensor Digitorum Communis
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 64 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
D. L. Lee, J. Fleisher, H. E. McLoone, K. Kotani, and J. T. Dennerlein
Alternative Computer Mouse Design and Testing to Reduce Finger Extensor Muscle Activity During Mouse Use
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, August 1, 2007; 49(4): 573 - 584.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. P. Coxon, C. M. Stinear, and W. D. Byblow
Selective Inhibition of Movement
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2480 - 2489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. L. McIsaac and A. J. Fuglevand
Motor-Unit Synchrony Within and Across Compartments of the Human Flexor Digitorum Superficialis
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 550 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. J Butler, S. L Kilbreath, R. B Gorman, and S. C Gandevia
Selective recruitment of single motor units in human flexor digitorum superficialis muscle during flexion of individual fingers
J. Physiol., August 15, 2005; 567(1): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C Westad and R. H Westgaard
The influence of contraction amplitude and firing history on spike-triggered averaged trapezius motor unit potentials
J. Physiol., February 1, 2005; 562(3): 965 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Lang and M. H. Schieber
Human Finger Independence: Limitations due to Passive Mechanical Coupling Versus Active Neuromuscular Control
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 2802 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. T. Reilly, M. A. Nordstrom, and M. H. Schieber
Short-Term Synchronization Between Motor Units in Different Functional Subdivisions of the Human Flexor Digitorum Profundus Muscle
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 734 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.