JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 26, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01190.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/1/27    most recent
01190.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berryman, L. J
Right arrow Articles by Hsiao, S. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berryman, L. J
Right arrow Articles by Hsiao, S. S
Submitted on November 8, 2005
Accepted on March 29, 2006

Representation of object size in the somatosensory system

Lauren J Berryman1, Jeffrey M Yau1, and Steven S Hsiao1*

1 Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States; Department of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins U, Baltimore, Maryland, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins U, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steven.hsiao{at}jhu.edu.

In this study we investigate the haptic perception of object size. We report the results from four psychophysical experiments. In the first, we ask subjects to discriminate the size of objects that vary in surface curvature and compliance while changing contact force. We show that objects exhibit size constancy such that perception of object size using haptics does not change with changes in contact force. Based on these results, we hypothesize that size perception depends on the degree of spread between the digits at initial contact with objects. In the second experiment, we test this hypothesis by having subjects continuously contact an object that changes dynamically in size. We show that size perception takes into account the compliance of the object. In the third and fourth experiments we attempt to separate the individual contributions of proprioceptive and cutaneous input. In the third, we test the ability of subjects to perceive object size after altering the sensitivity of cutaneous receptors with adapting vibratory stimuli. The results from this experiment suggest that initial contact is signaled by SA1 and/or RA afferents. In the last experiment, we block cutaneous input at the site of contact by anesthetizing the digital nerves and show that proprioceptive information alone only provides a rough estimate of object size. We conclude that the perception of object size depends on inputs from the cutaneous slowly adapting type 1 afferents (SA1) and possibly the rapidly adapting afferents (RA), combined with inputs from proprioceptive afferents that signal the spread between digits.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.