JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 25, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01201.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/2630    most recent
01201.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brechmann, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brechmann, A.
Submitted on November 11, 2005
Accepted on January 16, 2006

Contralateral white noise selectively changes left human auditory cortex activity in a lexical decision task

Nicole Behne1*, Beate Wendt1, Henning Scheich1, and Andre Brechmann1

1 Non-Invasive Brain Imaging, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nbehne{at}ifn-magdeburg.de.

In a previous study, we hypothesized that the approach of presenting information-bearing stimuli to one ear and noise to the other ear may be a general strategy to determine hemispheric specialization in auditory cortex (AC). In that study, we confirmed the dominant role of the right AC in directional categorization of frequency modulations by showing that fMRI activation of right but not left AC was sharply emphasized when masking noise was presented to the contralateral ear. Here, we tested this hypothesis using a lexical decision task supposed to be mainly processed in the left hemisphere. Subjects had to distinguish between pseudowords and natural words presented monaurally to the left or right ear either with or without white noise to the other ear. According to our hypothesis, we expected a strong effect of contralateral noise on fMRI activity in left AC. For the control conditions without noise, we found that activation in both auditory cortices was stronger on contralateral than on ipsilateral word stimulation consistent with a more influential contralateral than ipsilateral auditory pathway. Additional presentation of contralateral noise did not significantly change activation in right AC, whereas it led to a significant increase of activation in left AC compared to the condition without noise. This is consistent with a left hemispheric specialization for lexical decisions. Thus, our results support the hypothesis that activation by ipsilateral information-bearing stimuli is up-regulated mainly in the hemisphere specialized for a given task when noise is presented to the more influential contralateral ear.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Smits, E. Visch-Brink, C. K. Schraa-Tam, P. J. Koudstaal, and A. van der Lugt
Functional MR Imaging of Language Processing: An Overview of Easy-to-Implement Paradigms for Patient Care and Clinical Research
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S145 - S158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.