|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Neurobiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
2 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute for Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
3 Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, New York, 10003, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bmalone{at}mednet.ucla.edu.
In many animals, the information most important for processing communication sounds, including speech, consists of temporal envelope cues below approximately 20 Hz. Physiological studies, however, typically emphasize upper limits of modulation encoding. Responses to sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) are generally summarized by modulation transfer functions (MTFs), which emphasize tuning to modulation frequency rather than representations of instantaneous stimulus amplitude. Unfortunately, MTFs fail to capture important but nonlinear aspects of amplitude coding in the central auditory system. We focus on an alternative data representation, the modulation period histogram (MPH), which depicts the spike train folded on the modulation period of the SAM stimulus. At low modulation frequencies, the fluctuations of stimulus amplitude in dB are robustly encoded by the cycle-by-cycle response dynamics evident in the MPH. We demonstrate that all of the parameters that define a SAM stimulus - carrier frequency, carrier level, modulation frequency, and modulation depth - are reflected in the shape of cortical MPHs. In many neurons that are nonmonotonically tuned for sound amplitude, the representation of modulation frequency is typically sacrificed in order to preserve the mapping between the instantaneous discharge rate and the instantaneous stimulus amplitude, resulting in two response modes per modulation cycle. This behavior, as well as the relatively poor tuning of cortical MTFs, suggests that auditory cortical neurons are not well suited for operating as a "modulation filterbank." Instead, our results suggest that below 20 Hz, the processing of modulated signals is better described as envelope shape discrimination rather than modulation frequency extraction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. Brugge, K. V. Nourski, H. Oya, R. A. Reale, H. Kawasaki, M. Steinschneider, and M. A. Howard III Coding of Repetitive Transients by Auditory Cortex on Heschl's Gyrus J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2358 - 2374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kusmierek and J. P. Rauschecker Functional Specialization of Medial Auditory Belt Cortex in the Alert Rhesus Monkey J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1606 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Foffani, M. L. Morales-Botello, and J. Aguilar Spike Timing, Spike Count, and Temporal Information for the Discrimination of Tactile Stimuli in the Rat Ventrobasal Complex J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5964 - 5973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Scott, B. J. Malone, and M. N. Semple Representation of Dynamic Interaural Phase Difference in Auditory Cortex of Awake Rhesus Macaques J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1781 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zheng and M. A. Escabi Distinct Roles for Onset and Sustained Activity in the Neuronal Code for Temporal Periodicity and Acoustic Envelope Shape J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14230 - 14244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Overath, S. Kumar, K. von Kriegstein, and T. D. Griffiths Encoding of Spectral Correlation over Time in Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., December 3, 2008; 28(49): 13268 - 13273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Qin, J. Y. Wang, and Y. Sato Representations of Cat Meows and Human Vowels in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Cats J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2305 - 2319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |