JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01204.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/1237    most recent
01204.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crotty, P.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, W. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crotty, P.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, W. B
Submitted on November 12, 2005
Accepted on March 21, 2006

The metabolic energy cost of action potential velocity

Patrick Crotty1, Thomas Sangrey1, and William B Levy1*

1 Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wbl{at}virginia.edu.

The action potential of the unmyelinated nerve is metabolically expensive. Using the energetic cost per unit length for the biophysically modeled action potential of the squid giant axon, we analyze this cost and identify one possible optimization. The energetic cost arising from an action potential is divided into three separate components: (1) the depolarization of the rising phase; (2) the hyperpolarization of the falling phase; and (3) the largest component, the overlapping of positive and negative currents, which has no electrical effect. Using both the Hodgkin-Huxley model and an improved version of the Hodgkin-Huxley model, we investigate the variation of these three components as a function of easily evolvable parameters, axon diameter and ion channel densities. Assuming conduction velocity is well-designed for each organism, the energy component associated with the rising phase attains a minimum near the biological values of the diameter and channel densities. This optimization is explained by the membrane capacitance per unit length. The functional capacitance is the sum of the intrinsic membrane capacitance and the gating capacitance associated with the sodium channel, and this capacitance minimizes at nearly the same values of diameter and channel density. Because capacitance is temperature independent and because this result is independent of the assumed velocity, the result generalizes to unmyelinated mammalian axons. That is, channel density is arguably an evolved property that goes hand-in-hand with the evolutionary stability of the sodium channel.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.