JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 6, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01207.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/4/1758    most recent
01207.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biesdorf, S.
Right arrow Articles by Straka, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biesdorf, S.
Right arrow Articles by Straka, H.
Submitted on October 30, 2007
Accepted on February 2, 2008

Differential inhibitory control of semicircular canal nerve afferent-evoked inputs in second-order vestibular neurons by glycinergic and GABAergic circuits

Stefan Biesdorf1, David Malinvaud2, Ingrid Reichenberger1, Sandra Pfanzelt2, and Hans Straka2*

1 Dept. of Physiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
2 L.N.R.S., CNRS UMR7060, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hans.straka{at}univ-paris5.fr.

Labyrinthine nerve-evoked monosynaptic EPSPs in second-order vestibular neurons (2°VN) sum with disynaptic IPSPs that originate from the thickest afferent fibers of the same nerve branch and are mediated by neurons in the ipsilateral vestibular nucleus. Pharmacological properties of the inhibition and the interaction with the afferent excitation were studied by recording monosynaptic responses of phasic and tonic 2°VN in an isolated frog brain after electrical stimulation of individual semicircular canal nerves. Specific transmitter antagonists revealed glycine and GABAA receptor-mediated IPSPs with a disynaptic onset only in phasic but not in tonic 2°VN. Compared to GABAergic IPSPs, glycinergic responses in phasic 2°VN have larger amplitudes, a longer duration and reduce early and late components of the afferent nerve-evoked subthreshold activation and spike discharge. The difference in profile of the disynaptic glycinergic and GABAergic inhibition is compatible with the larger number of glycinergic as opposed to GABAergic terminal-like structures on 2°VN. The increase in monosynaptic excitation after a block of the disynaptic inhibition in phasic 2°VN is in part mediated by a NMDA receptor-activated component. Although inhibitory inputs were superimposed on monosynaptic EPSPs in tonic 2°VN as well, the much longer latency of these IPSPs excludes a control by short-latency inhibitory feed-forward side-loops as observed in phasic 2°VN. The differential synaptic organization of the inhibitory control of labyrinthine afferent signals in phasic and tonic 2°VN is consistent with the different intrinsic signal processing modes of the two neuronal types and suggests a co-adaptation of intrinsic membrane properties and emerging network properties.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.