JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 16, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01209.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1422    most recent
01209.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Depeault, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Depeault, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.
Submitted on October 30, 2007
Accepted on January 14, 2008

Tactile Speed Scaling: Contributions of Time and Space

Alexandra Depeault1, El-Mehdi Meftah1, and C. Elaine Chapman2*

1 Physiologie, Univ de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
2 Physiology, Univ. de Montreal, PO Box 6128, Stn centre ville, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Canada; Readaptation, University de Montreal, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.elaine.chapman{at}umontreal.ca.

A major challenge for the brain is to extract precise information about the attributes of tactile stimuli from signals that co-vary with multiple parameters, e.g. speed and texture in the case of scanning movements. We determined the ability of humans to estimate the tangential speed of surfaces moved under the stationary fingertip, and the extent to which the physical characteristics of the surfaces modify speed perception. Scanning speed ranged from 33-110 mm/s (duration of motion constant). Subjects could scale tactile scanning speed, but surface structure was essential because the subjects were poor at scaling the speed of a moving smooth surface. For textured surfaces, subjective magnitude estimates increased linearly across the range of speeds tested. The spatial characteristics of the surfaces influenced speed perception, with the roughest surface (8 mm spatial period, SP) being perceived as moving 15% slower than the smoother, textured surfaces (2-3 mm SP). Neither dot disposition (periodic, non periodic) nor dot density contributed to the results, suggesting that the critical factor was dot spacing in the direction of the scan. A single monotonic relation between subjective speed and temporal frequency (speed/SP) was obtained when the ratings were normalized for SP. This provides clear predictions for identifying those cortical neurones that play a critical role in tactile motion perception, and the underlying neuronal code. Finally, the results were consistent with observations in the visual system (decreased subjective speed with a decrease in spatial frequency, 1/SP), suggesting that stimulus motion is processed similarly in both sensory systems.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.