JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 15, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01214.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/2951    most recent
01214.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, W.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, E. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dong, W.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, E. S
Submitted on November 16, 2005
Accepted on February 12, 2006

Middle ear forward and reverse transmission in gerbil

Wei Dong* and Elizabeth S Olson

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wd2015{at}columbia.edu.

The middle ear transmits environmental sound to the inner ear. It also transmits acoustic energy sourced within the inner ear out to the ear canal, where it can be detected with a sensitive microphone as an otoacoustic emission. Otoacoustic emissions are an important noninvasive measure of the condition of sensory hair cells and to use them most effectively one must know how they are shaped by the middle ear. In this contribution, forward and reverse transmission through the middle ear were studied by simultaneously measuring intracochlear pressure in scala vestibuli near the stapes and ear canal pressure. Measurements were made in gerbil, in vivo, with acoustic two-tone stimuli. The forward transmission pressure gain was approximately 20 - 25 dB, with a phase-frequency relationship that could be fit by a straight line, and was thus characteristic of a delay, over a wide frequency range. The forward delay was ~ 32 µs. The reverse transmission pressure loss was on average ~ 35 dB, and the phase-frequency relationship was again delay-like with a delay of ~ 38 µs. Therefore, to a first approximation the middle ear operates similarly in the forward and reverse directions. The observation that the amount of pressure reduction in reverse transmission was greater than the amount of pressure gain in forward transmission suggests that complex motions of the tympanic membrane and ossicles affect reverse more than forward transmission.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
O. de La Rochefoucauld and E. S. Olson
The Role of Organ of Corti Mass in Passive Cochlear Tuning
Biophys. J., November 15, 2007; 93(10): 3434 - 3450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.