JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 28, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01217.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/2143    most recent
01217.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Avoli, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Avoli, M.
Submitted on November 17, 2005
Accepted on December 22, 2005

ALTERED INHIBITION IN LATERAL AMYGDALA NETWORKSIN A RAT MODEL OF TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY

Ruba Benini1 and Massimo Avoli2*

1 Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery, and of Physiology, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
2 Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery, and of Physiology, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana e Farmacologia, Universita di Roma, Rome, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: massimo.avoli{at}mcgill.ca.

Clinical and experimental evidence indicates that the amygdala is involved in limbic seizures observed in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Here, we used simultaneous field and intracellular recordings from horizontal brain slices obtained from pilocarpine-treated rats and age-matched non-epileptic controls (NEC) to shed light on the electrophysiological changes that occur within the lateral nucleus (LA) of the amygdala. No significant differences in LA neuronal intrinsic properties were observed between pilocarpine-treated and NEC tissue. However, spontaneous field activity could be recorded in the LA of 21% of pilocarpine-treated slices but never from NECs. At the intracellular level, this network activity was characterized by robust neuronal firing and was abolished by glutamatergic antagonists. In addition, we could identify in all pilocarpine-treated LA neurons: (i) large amplitude depolarizing postsynaptic potentials (PSPs), and (ii) a lower incidence of spontaneous hyperpolarizing PSPs as compared with NECs. Single-shock stimulation of LA networks in the presence of glutamatergic antagonists revealed a biphasic IPSP in both NEC and pilocarpine-treated tissue. The reversal potential of the early GABAA-receptor mediated component, but not of the late GABAB-receptor mediated component, was significantly more depolarized in pilocarpine-treated slices. Furthermore, the peak conductance of both fast and late IPSP components had significantly lower values in pilocarpine-treated LA cells. Finally, paired-pulse stimulation protocols in the presence of glutamatergic antagonists revealed a less pronounced depression of the second IPSP in pilocarpine-treated slices as compared to NEC. Altogether, these findings suggest that alterations in both pre- and postsynaptic inhibitory mechanisms contribute to synaptic hyperexcitability of LA networks in epileptic rats.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.