JN Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 9, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01219.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/3313    most recent
01219.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furukawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Riquimaroux, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furukawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Riquimaroux, H.
Submitted on November 30, 2004
Accepted on February 8, 2005

Dependence of the interaural phase difference sensitivities of inferior collicular neurons on a preceding tone and its implications in neural population coding

Shigeto Furukawa1*, Katuhiro Maki1, Makio Kashino1, and Hiroshi Riquimaroux2

1 Human and Information Science Laboratory, NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan
2 Department of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: shig{at}avg.brl.ntt.co.jp.

This study examined the sensitivities of the neuronal responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) to the interaural phase difference (IPD) of a preceding tone, and explored its implications in the neural-population representation of the IPD. Single-unit responses were recorded from the IC of anesthetized gerbils. The stimulus was a dichotic tone sequence with a common frequency (typically the unit's best frequency) and level (10-20 dB relative to the threshold), consisting of a conditioner (200 ms) followed by a probe (50 ms) with a silent gap (5-100 ms) between them. The IPDs of the two tones were varied independently. The presence of a conditioner generally suppressed the probe-driven responses; the effect size increasing as the conditioner IPD approached the unit's most responsive IPD. The units' preferred IPDs were relatively invariant with the conditioner IPD. Two types of models were used to evaluate the effects of a conditioner on the IPD representation at the level of IC neural population. One was a version of the population vector model. The other was the hemispheric channel model, which assumed that the stimulus IPD is represented by the activities of two broadly tuned hemispheric channels. Both models predicted that, in the presence of a conditioner, the IPD representation would shift in a direction away from the conditioner IPD. This appears to emphasize the difference between the conditioner and the probe IPDs. The results indicate that in the IC, neural processes for IPD adapt to the stimulus history to enhance the representational contrast between successive sounds.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. C. Nelson, Z. M. Smith, and E. D. Young
Wide-Dynamic-Range Forward Suppression in Marmoset Inferior Colliculus Neurons Is Generated Centrally and Accounts for Perceptual Masking
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2553 - 2562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Reches and Y. Gutfreund
Stimulus-Specific Adaptations in the Gaze Control System of the Barn Owl
J. Neurosci., February 6, 2008; 28(6): 1523 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Gutfreund and E. I. Knudsen
Adaptation in the Auditory Space Map of the Barn Owl
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 813 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.