JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 1, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01239.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/2133    most recent
01239.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiss, L. A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiss, L. A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. D
Submitted on November 27, 2006
Accepted on July 30, 2007

Effects of stimulus spectral contrast on receptive fields of dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons

Lina A.J. Reiss1, Sharba Bandyopadhyay1, and Eric D Young1*

1 Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eyoung{at}jhu.edu.

Neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) exhibit strong nonlinearities in spectral processing. Low-order models that transform the stimulus spectrum into discharge rate using a combination of 1st- and 2nd-order weighting of the spectrum (quadratic models) usually fail to predict responses to novel stimuli for principal neurons in the DCN, even though they work well in ventral cochlear nucleus (Yu and Young 2000). Here we investigate the effects of spectral contrast on the performance of such models. Typically, the models fail for stimuli with natural-sound-like spectral contrasts (~12-dB), but have good prediction performance at small (3-dB) contrasts. The weights also typically increase substantially in amplitude at smaller spectral contrast. These changes in weight size with contrast are partly inherited from similar effects seen in auditory nerve fibers, but there must be additional effects from inhibitory circuits in the DCN. These results provide insight into the reasons for the poor performance of spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF) models in predicting responses of auditory neurons. Because the general shapes of the weights do not change between low and high contrast, they also suggest that STRFs may capture meaningful properties of neural receptive fields, even though they do not do well at predicting responses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.