JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 7, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01243.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/4/2917    most recent
01243.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gussin, D. J
Right arrow Articles by Maler, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gussin, D. J
Right arrow Articles by Maler, L.
Submitted on November 28, 2006
Accepted on February 5, 2007

Limits of Linear Rate Coding of Dynamic Stimuli by Electroreceptor Afferents

Daniel J Gussin1, Jan Benda2, and Leonard Maler1*

1 Cell and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2 Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lmaler{at}uottawa.ca.

We estimated the frequency-intensity (f-I) curves of P-unit electroreceptors using 4 Hz random amplitude modulations (RAMs) and using the covariance method (50 Hz RAMs). Both methods showed that P-units are linear encoders of stimulus amplitude with additive noise; the gain of the f-I curve was, on average, 0.32 spikes/s/µV and 2.38 spikes/s/µV for the low and high frequency cut-offs respectively. There were two sources of apparent noise in the encoding process: the first was the variability of baseline P-unit discharge and the second was the variation of receptor discharge due to variability of the stimulus slope independent of its intensity. The covariance method showed that a linear combination of eigenvectors representing the time-weighted stimulus intensity (E1) and its derivative (E2) could account for, on average, 92% of the total response variability; E1 by itself accounted for 76% of the variability. The low gain of the low frequency f-I curve implies that detection of small (1 µV) signals would require integration over many receptors (~1200) and time (200 ms); even then, signals that elicit behavioural responses could not be detected using rate coding with the estimated gain and noise levels. Weak signals at the limit of behavioural thresholds could be detected if the animal were able to extract E1 from the population of responding P-units; we propose a tentative mechanism for this operation although there is no evidence as to whether it is actually implemented in the nervous system of these fish.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.