JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 14, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01247.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/146    most recent
01247.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butson, C. R
Right arrow Articles by Clark, G. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butson, C. R
Right arrow Articles by Clark, G. A
Submitted on November 29, 2006
Accepted on November 11, 2007

Random noise paradoxically improves light-intensity encoding in Hermissenda photoreceptor network

Christopher R Butson1 and Gregory A Clark1*

1 Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Greg.Clark{at}utah.edu.

Neurons are notoriously noisy devices. Although the traditional view posits that noise degrades system performance, recent evidence suggests that noise may instead enhance neural information processing under certain conditions. Here we report that random channel and synaptic noise improve the ability of a biologically realistic computational model of the Hermissenda eye to encode light intensity. The model was created in GENESIS, and is based on a previous model used to examine effects of changes in type-B photoreceptor excitability, synaptic strength, and network architecture. The network consists of two type-A and three type-B multicompartmental photoreceptors. Each compartment contains a population of Hodgkin-Huxley type ion channels, and each cell is stimulated via artificial light currents. We found that the addition of random channel and synaptic noise yielded a significant improvement in the accuracy of the network's encoding of light intensity across eight light levels spanning 3.5 log units (p < .001, modified Levene test). The benefits of noise remained after controlling for several consequences of randomness in the model. Additionally, improvements were not confined to peri-threshold stimulus intensities. Finally, the effects of noise are not present in individual neurons, but rather are an emergent property of the synaptically connected network that is independent of stochastic resonance. These results suggest that noise plays a constructive role in neural information processing, a concept that could have important implications for understanding neural information processing or designing neural interface devices.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.